sashbar
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Messages
- 3,044
- Reaction score
- 1,183
- Location
- Behind the Irony Curtain
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Not every image benefits from the common, knee-jerk TPF re-work approach we typically see, which is to crop the living $hi+ out of the OP's original image and somehow think that,"Makes a better picture." In cases like the first shot, the OP's night shot of the elderly man and woman, and the second shot, the scene of the elderly man and woman, each with a cane: how those people are relating to the real-world before them, and their place within a larger scene, THAT realtionship is the picture.
I find the same reflexive tendency toward very heavy cropping of street scenes leads to a lot of boring shot re-works where we see far too little, at too high a magnification, with the shots often stripped of their original context. Just as in a movie, there are long shots or "establishing shots", medium shots, close-ups, and extreme close-ups. One cannot successful live by bread alone, just the same way one cannot automatically take any image and think that cropping the living $hi+ out of it is the way to make it "better". Making everything into a medium shot, or a close-up, is not always the answer.
Some shots are meant to be "scenes", with people in them. There's a mentality here on TPF that in street work, there can be no 'scene' left in anything that's to be considered a good picture. It's time to start addressing that tendency toward cropping wayyyyy too much out, in a knee-jerk type of way that ignores the value of the overview shot, or the medium shot.
The original photo is almost perfect, as-shown originally. Same with the second shot.
Very well said.



