This, and this location in particular, is almost becoming a cliche. While I am sure that something original can be done with it, I'm just not seeing it here - simply more well e()posed photos of pealing paint and spooky graffiti. When approaching something like this I think it's very important to look at it as anew.
I absolutely agree with you. However, I feel that "spooky" graffiti adds to the overall aesthetic of the building in modern times. With there being so much, with such vulgarities, I couldnt help but feel it indirectly added to the overall feel of the building, which was rundown and creepy. Am I primarily focused on documenting the graffiti? No. Although the building was very spooky in itself, with its natural aesthetic, it creeped me out more when i saw "welcome to hell" on a door attached to a dark room. Replicating how I felt while aimlessly frolicking amongst the building was something i wanted to exemplify in the images and the graffiti contributed to that.
The peeling paint, while cliche, is beautiful. It shows what time does to buildings and the more it peels, the more texture is involved. It's like tree rings, in a way. Observing the rings, you can make an assessment on how old the tree is. While less accurate, the degree of paint peeling acts in the same way, showing the age of the building.
Approaching this building, I was not taking any prior consideration as to how I was going to photograph it. I wasn't taking any other cliches into consideration nor have i even seen much similar photography (i also havent looked hard enough.) But I don't think abandoned insane asylums are cliche at all. Maybe a sunrise. But how many abandoned insane asylums do you come across?
But I like that you feel the way you do. Given the images I have provided, what would you have done differently, to avoid being cliche?
Thanks for responding!