- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 4,014
- Reaction score
- 6,703
- Location
- NW Florida
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
My conclusions on the 150-600 are that if you have no other decent long lens, then it is a good buy - with cautions. the depth of field at 6.3 is only about 3 1/2 inches tops. Even at f/9 or 10 is is still quite shallow so for birds with long necks like the Anhinga or Cormorant, if their heads aren't almost parallel to their bodies you're going to have to go to f/9 or 10 and thus have to increase your ISO significantly in lower light conditions.
Much better results even at 6.3 over the Sigma, so I will send te Sigma back to LensRentals and be glad I tried it out first.
Static shots make the Sigma lens shine, but fast moving objects in confined spaces make it cumbersome and very difficult to get a good focus lock. However, the worst feature of this lens is the weight. After a day of handheld shots, I was sore everywhere. Plan on monopod or tripod use almost exclusively unlee you are just a brute of a person.
I shot this one with my 80-400 and a 1.4 extender.
Much better results even at 6.3 over the Sigma, so I will send te Sigma back to LensRentals and be glad I tried it out first.
Static shots make the Sigma lens shine, but fast moving objects in confined spaces make it cumbersome and very difficult to get a good focus lock. However, the worst feature of this lens is the weight. After a day of handheld shots, I was sore everywhere. Plan on monopod or tripod use almost exclusively unlee you are just a brute of a person.
I shot this one with my 80-400 and a 1.4 extender.