Another Equipment Question

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by jmtonkin, Jan 24, 2012.

  1. jmtonkin

    jmtonkin No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Minnesota, South Dakota (for school)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I purchased my camera and lens right around four months ago. Now, I'm wanting a new lens. My question, however, is this: Should I worry about getting a new lens first, or should I get a flash or two?

    I find, more often than not, that the on camera flash produces very harsh shadows and gives that "center-of-the-eye catch light." Also, I hate to think of all the creative opportunities that I'm missing out on because of no off camera flash.

    That said, my lens's lowest f/# is 3.5 (Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6). I'd like a prime lens that would allow me to go even more open (preferably 1.4-1.8). I'd like to shoot some sports/concerts at school or maybe even a wedding (my step-brother is getting married at the end of the summer) and I'm worried that my equipment is inadequate for these lighting conditions.

    If you were in my position, what would be your next purchase?


     
  2. borisnikon

    borisnikon TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    South-east England
    A yongnuo 560, the only thing is that it is purely manual but it is cheap and not so crappy.
    Just look on eBay they are about £50-£60
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2012
  3. hashemi111

    hashemi111 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    35mm prime lens. If money is no issue, get the f/1.4. If money is an issue, the f/1.8 is the ticket. When you open up the aperture to f/1.8 on the 35mm lens, the depth of focus is super duper slim and even more with f/1.4. It let's you get some focused shots without a tripod that you normally wouldn't be able to at f/3.5. If you get an f/1.4 and take a picture with it open all the way, your depth of focus will be so slim that a little tiny movement forward or backward will blur your focus point. f/1.8 is enough IMO.
     
  4. borisnikon

    borisnikon TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    South-east England
    I second the 35mm 1.8, love mine
     
  5. jmtonkin

    jmtonkin No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Minnesota, South Dakota (for school)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    If money was not an issue, I'd be looking at either the Nikon 85mm 1.4 or the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8...After looking at some sample shots, the 35mm 1.8 looks pretty good. It appears to be very sharp and have a very nice shallow depth of field. If I were to go this route, the lens is only $199 new, which would allow me to also get a flash and a few other random accessories.
     
  6. Jeremy Z

    Jeremy Z No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    If I were you, I would make the decision based on what I needed right now. Buying based on something you might do is risky.

    It sounds to me like a good bounce flash would be your best investment, as you have already noticed the limitations of the dumpy little built-in flash. With a good bounce flash, your indoor flash photos, with any lens, will improve by 402%.

    If you want to do indoor shooting of stationary subjects, then a tripod should be your next investment.

    If a tripod isn't an option for your stationary subjects, go for a faster lens, maybe a prime.

    But I think a good bounce flash really gives a lot of versatility. Get one that swivels too, so you can bounce it even with vertical shots.
     
  7. davisphotos

    davisphotos No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Your budget would be a useful piece of information to give you better advice. I have a 35mm, and it is one of my favorite lenses. If you have about $500, you should be able to get the 35mm f1.8 and a bounce flash. Even without off camera flash, you can do a lot with bounce flash, either off walls and ceilings indoors, or with a bounce card outdoors.
     
  8. sparks017

    sparks017 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Auburn, WA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    My first lens that I purchased was the 50mm 1.4 which works great for low light situations, and then I just bought a cheap vivitar which works fine for now.
     
  9. o hey tyler

    o hey tyler Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    9,783
    Likes Received:
    2,723
    Location:
    Maine
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    These other posters suggested the 35mm f/1.8... While it is a decent lens for a DX camera, I've also heard that it exhibits a lot of chromatic aberration. Might be something that you look at before you purchase the lens over perhaps a Nikon 50mm lens.
     
  10. jmtonkin

    jmtonkin No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Minnesota, South Dakota (for school)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'm planning on using a good chunk of my tax returns to make this purchase. I'm allowing myself not much more than $800 to spend on this. I realize I could buy a flash AND a lens for that much, but I'm wondering if I should should invest it in better lens or if I should buy a flash or two/tripod.

    Nikon SB-900 - $422
    Nikon 50mm 1.4 - $409

    ^Thoughts?

    Like I said, I can't decide if this is a better route, or if going with a better piece of glass is a better route...
     
  11. djacobox372

    djacobox372 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Since you have a d300s, you can use older manual focus AIS lenses. A 50mm f1.8 AIS (series E) only cost around $30-40 on ebay, you might consider one of those.
     
  12. Dominantly

    Dominantly TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA (RB)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit


    I'd buy a SB-700.

    What about adding a AF-Zoom Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 IF?
    [h=1][/h]
     

Share This Page