Thanks...noise...got it!
I appreciate the feedback... so the reason it look the way it does is becasue they are way out of focus?
I did 1.8 for more light and blurred background.... I'm not sure how to get more light in..
So would an app of say 3.5 be a sharper image? I could bump the iso to 1600 and try that
I really appreciate your feedback! I just did a search and i came yoo with anywhere feom $30 to $250...Thanks...noise...got it!
I appreciate the feedback... so the reason it look the way it does is becasue they are way out of focus?
I did 1.8 for more light and blurred background.... I'm not sure how to get more light in..
So would an app of say 3.5 be a sharper image? I could bump the iso to 1600 and try that
Hi Kelly. Yes, f/3.5 is actually a good place to start with the 50mm lens on an APS-C camera, in order to get a fairly shallow depth of field look, with the blurred background, but with enough depth of field to show a person (adult shown half-body, child shown full-body,baed on average distance and lens field of view angle) in an environment where they are crisp and sharply-rendered, but the background behind is nicely blurred; shooting wide-open at f/1.8 is often going to show some parts of the person as out of focus, but f/3.5 will usually have just about enough to render the person's entire head (meaning the hair, the mask of the face, the chin,and the nose, and the ears) in acceptably sharp focus.
Stopping the lens down, to a medium-value aperture size like f/4 can help get more of the child into crisp focus, and stopping the lens down more, to even-smaller sized lens openings like f/4.2 or f/4.5 or f/4.8 can add additional depth of field to the person-zone, while only slightly decreasing the background blurriness. I like f/5.6 often times, for the way it shoots a nice pic, with plenty of DOF, and yet, still, some backdrop blurring.
I really think that the best shots of this type come from bounced flash, flash right in the hotshoe and angled upward, and bounced sideways,or forward, or even backward, with the flash's zoom head set to the 75mm to 105mm range, which means a narrow,tight,concentrated beam spread. Bounced flash is probably the absolute easiest way to get fantastic indoor family pictures. With just a day or two of practice, using this type of bounced flash indoors, you'll start making beautifully-lighted pictures.
With a decent, TTL speedlight flash unit for your Canon, it'll be super-easy to get great light! And easy! TTL stands for Through The Lens light metering and flash control. A good TTL flash for the Rebel is a great tool for any parent who wants to do indoor candids.
Thanks...noise...got it!
I appreciate the feedback... so the reason it look the way it does is becasue they are way out of focus?
I did 1.8 for more light and blurred background.... I'm not sure how to get more light in..
So would an app of say 3.5 be a sharper image? I could bump the iso to 1600 and try that
Hi Kelly. Yes, f/3.5 is actually a good place to start with the 50mm lens on an APS-C camera, in order to get a fairly shallow depth of field look, with the blurred background, but with enough depth of field to show a person (adult shown half-body, child shown full-body,baed on average distance and lens field of view angle) in an environment where they are crisp and sharply-rendered, but the background behind is nicely blurred; shooting wide-open at f/1.8 is often going to show some parts of the person as out of focus, but f/3.5 will usually have just about enough to render the person's entire head (meaning the hair, the mask of the face, the chin,and the nose, and the ears) in acceptably sharp focus.
Stopping the lens down, to a medium-value aperture size like f/4 can help get more of the child into crisp focus, and stopping the lens down more, to even-smaller sized lens openings like f/4.2 or f/4.5 or f/4.8 can add additional depth of field to the person-zone, while only slightly decreasing the background blurriness. I like f/5.6 often times, for the way it shoots a nice pic, with plenty of DOF, and yet, still, some backdrop blurring.
I really think that the best shots of this type come from bounced flash, flash right in the hotshoe and angled upward, and bounced sideways,or forward, or even backward, with the flash's zoom head set to the 75mm to 105mm range, which means a narrow,tight,concentrated beam spread. Bounced flash is probably the absolute easiest way to get fantastic indoor family pictures. With just a day or two of practice, using this type of bounced flash indoors, you'll start making beautifully-lighted pictures.
With a decent, TTL speedlight flash unit for your Canon, it'll be super-easy to get great light! And easy! TTL stands for Through The Lens light metering and flash control. A good TTL flash for the Rebel is a great tool for any parent who wants to do indoor candids.
Well...this one's recommended by a lot of people....Yongnuo YN 568EX II. Adorama has it at $49 right now, lower than the other big dealers.https://www.adorama.com/us 941946.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIyOKPw7bG2AIVzbbACh1tcQN8EAQYASABEgJkPfD_BwE
I'd check into the Rebel user's FAQ here for a few tips. Rebel Forum FAQ
There is a lot to unpack in that query.Wow... Thank you! Is using this flash hard to learn and understand or a pretty simple concept? Would i google external flash for canon? If i shot at 4, 5, or 6 my photos would be clearer? I always thought bokeh wad something important... is that not the case? I really appreciate the advice
The resolution of each lens design is not the same as any other, so it will depend on WHICH 24mm you get. Some are stellar, while some others are lacking in resolution ability and possibly other qualities.1 more question. I just got a 24mm.... will this give crisper inages inside my house?
thank you!!View attachment 151896
Whoops....despite my 568 search query, the link in my post above was to the Yongnuo 565 EX II mode, not the 568 EX II! The 568 EX II is going for just under $100 at most places.
Thanks for the response - I will look more into thisThe resolution of each lens design is not the same as any other, so it will depend on WHICH 24mm you get. Some are stellar, while some others are lacking in resolution ability and possibly other qualities.1 more question. I just got a 24mm.... will this give crisper inages inside my house?
Actually, since resolution is only ONE quality by which to evaluate lenses, you should consider WHICH qualities you need for your particular application. For instance; a lens that has a somewhat softer resolving power but excellent color rendition might be ideal for portraiture, for instance. You have already bought one now, so it might be silly to trade it off before you have a chance to give it a fair test, but in the future you can consider all the qualities of a lens and how it affects your photography. You can check sharpness, color, depth, contrast, chromatic aberration, cost, etc., and average out the attributes to compare with other lenses. You may find that sharpness falls somewhat below another desirable attribute that you consider more important.