Desi
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 832
- Reaction score
- 378
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #31
Natalie: Always nice to see a glimpse from the Bay Area. I'm a transplant to LA. I soo miss the rich greens and the redwoods. Thanks for playing!
#1: good self critique. Not bad foreground exposure. Did you use the pop-up or a more powerful flash? Still, as you said, harsh....and no sky.
#2: Nice exposure on the sky. Stars seem a bit out of focus. Not sure if that is due to large aperture or from the clouds. You're using a 20 mm lens, so large DOF. Foerground dark. Nice sky exposure. Again I see that long shutter speed on program, not something my camera does. I guess they are not all programmed the same.
#3 seems to be about the same exposure as #2. Double the shutter speed (1 full stop increase) but a smaller aperture (1 and 2/3rd stops decreased). (goes 1.4, 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22). You could have pushed the exposure more by going into bulb mode and going back to a larger aperture, but the risk is in overexposing the sky. The foreground that you are working with is just very dark with little natural light, so it will probably not give you a pleasing exposure without overcooking the sky (but I could be wrong).
#4 You pulled a lot out of it in post by using your fill-light. Good to know that the data is there if you know how to get it. It's a nice scene.
#1: good self critique. Not bad foreground exposure. Did you use the pop-up or a more powerful flash? Still, as you said, harsh....and no sky.
#2: Nice exposure on the sky. Stars seem a bit out of focus. Not sure if that is due to large aperture or from the clouds. You're using a 20 mm lens, so large DOF. Foerground dark. Nice sky exposure. Again I see that long shutter speed on program, not something my camera does. I guess they are not all programmed the same.
#3 seems to be about the same exposure as #2. Double the shutter speed (1 full stop increase) but a smaller aperture (1 and 2/3rd stops decreased). (goes 1.4, 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22). You could have pushed the exposure more by going into bulb mode and going back to a larger aperture, but the risk is in overexposing the sky. The foreground that you are working with is just very dark with little natural light, so it will probably not give you a pleasing exposure without overcooking the sky (but I could be wrong).
#4 You pulled a lot out of it in post by using your fill-light. Good to know that the data is there if you know how to get it. It's a nice scene.