What's new

B&W digital camera settings?

Kernix

TPF Noob!
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Location
Philadelphia, PA
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
I have a Canon digital Rebel XTi and I want to shoot some cityscapes in black & white. I set the Picture Style to Monochrome with settings of 3, 0, R, N (that's sharpness, contrast, filter effect [Red] and toning effect [None]). Was wondering if anyone can shoots with different settings and why.

Thanks!
 
The most common (and best IMO) advice is to shoot in Color (RAW) and convert to B&W with Photoshop or other software.
 
That's what I'm hearing from other people - thanks!
 
Agreed; shoot in color and do any B&W work in PP. This is also good because that way you're not stuck w/ a B&W version of a shot if it would otherwise work better in color.
 
The settings you have are extremely limiting. You have played with the red effect I assume? It darkens the sky a bit and brings out people's skin tones. Great when photographing people but not much else. There are plenty of times when you would want to mimic a blue or green filter.

In such cases it's always good to shoot colour and convert using your favourite software. Every software worth it's salt should give you some kind of option for blending the various red green and blue channels to grey.
 
When shooting for B&W, in addition to what has been already said about shooting in color and converting, Shoot with the mind set of B&W. Don't think convertion, Think that you have B&W film in the camera. It's harder than it sounds especially when shooting digital but it helps with composing, color positioning, lighting and other compositional elements as they are slightly different than in color. I have too often seen when people are thinking color, shooting in color then try converting later and have crappy conversion results and can't understand why.
 
When shooting for B&W, in addition to what has been already said about shooting in color and converting, Shoot with the mind set of B&W. Don't think convertion, Think that you have B&W film in the camera. It's harder than it sounds especially when shooting digital but it helps with composing, color positioning, lighting and other compositional elements as they are slightly different than in color. I have too often seen when people are thinking color, shooting in color then try converting later and have crappy conversion results and can't understand why.

Good advise, but hard to do for most people these days since most new shooters at least don't have black and white film experience. After 35 years of shooting I can turn on black and white any time I want. I sure shot enough cases if not truck loads of B&W film over the years. I doubt that a digital only shooter can envision black and white with out having that experience. This is just one more reason that I advocate that anyone that wants to learn photography ought to have some film experience. It teaches a different mindset. :D
 
ahmen to the above statement
 
Agreed! The best, and easiest way to make a B&W image is with B&W film.

Allan
 
Agreed! The best, and easiest way to make a B&W image is with B&W film.

Allan

I'm not sure I would call it the easiest. It takes a knowledge and possession of a vast array of filters to shoot B&W film. Glass filters that are not needed for digital and are much easier and cheaper to duplicate in post processing. Film is the best way however to learn to think and train your brain to see in black and white.
 
I disagree with the idea that learning B&W is best done with film. I see absolutely no advantage over using a digital camera that has a B&W mode. To me, its seems no advantage either way.

The supposed advantage of film is, I presume, that you never see the photograph in color and, once shot, the conversion of the subject color into B&W tones is fixed. If you shoot B&W JPEG with very normal settings and no filter effect (not the red the OP is using) you have pretty much the same thing as shooting B&W film. For the real beginner, this is where you should start. As you develop an eye for "seeing" in B&W you can progress to more advanced techniques.

For the serious shooter, shooting either B&W film with no collection of filters or shooting B&W JPEG w/o electronic filter ajustment is not optimal. To do good film work you need filters. To do good digital you need the electronic equivalent of the same. You to change your camera settings on a shot for shot basis. With digital, by far the best way to do this is to shoot RAW (which is always color) and do the B&W conversion in post processing to make the "filter" and tonal adjustments (contrast, ...) necessary.
 
Agreed! The best, and easiest way to make a B&W image is with B&W film.

Allan

I'm not sure I would call it the easiest. It takes a knowledge and possession of a vast array of filters to shoot B&W film. Glass filters that are not needed for digital and are much easier and cheaper to duplicate in post processing. Film is the best way however to learn to think and train your brain to see in black and white.


Interesting thought .... I'm curious, since I never shot in film and processed in digital ... My B/W film imaging was in the day where everything was done in the darkroom ...

In this era where alot of film shooters do their printing digitally, do you still need an array of filters if you shoot B/W film? Can you shoot B/W film without filters and then add the filters in Photoshop successfully?
 
your correct, with digital there is no need to use a variety of filters, however, that does not mean that one should not be thinking in black and white terms when shooting with digital .

the post processing process gives one a variety of tools when converting, but it also takes an understanding of what your vision is before you fire the shutter.
 
Agreed! The best, and easiest way to make a B&W image is with B&W film.

Allan

I'm not sure I would call it the easiest. It takes a knowledge and possession of a vast array of filters to shoot B&W film. Glass filters that are not needed for digital and are much easier and cheaper to duplicate in post processing. Film is the best way however to learn to think and train your brain to see in black and white.


Interesting thought .... I'm curious, since I never shot in film and processed in digital ... My B/W film imaging was in the day where everything was done in the darkroom ...

In this era where alot of film shooters do their printing digitally, do you still need an array of filters if you shoot B/W film? Can you shoot B/W film without filters and then add the filters in Photoshop successfully?

My question would be why would someone be mixing the two mediums. I have yet to see a scanned negative image that has the same amount of detail that the negative did. Close, but not all. If I shoot film, which I very rarely do these days, I still have a dark room that I can use. I just don't choose to maintain a dark room these days.

To answer your question though, it could be done technically. But with out the experience, would the shooter have an idea of what they were trying to do in the first place or are they just swagging around in the digital trying to find what they like.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom