MattCatHat
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2014
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
I am a complete amateur, so if I sound inexperienced, I am..
Okay so ever since I really took an interest in photography I have just not being hitting the mark in image quality and sharpness and even just nice full rich colours. I think I kind of know the answers to my problems but would love to know some more from the community.
Camera body: I have a cannon 500d (bought second hand with a relatively high shutter count)
Lenses: first of all I have two lenses I got from my dads old collection they are probably 10years old, one is a kit lens 18-55mm f3.5 and the other is a cannon 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 and lastly I bought an old school prime lens by yashica it's a 50mm f2
The yashica has a few spots and specks on the inside of the lens so I will be dismantling it when my cleaning kit arrives but is by far my favourite lens, of course I had no idea about crop sensors or anything when I bought it so it's more like a 70 something mm so I would like to maybe get a 28mm next probably a "vintage" lens again. the kit lens seems to be the one I have the most trouble with as I use it quiet a lot for its wider angle range. I've never thought the af was any good on it and it's just horrible lens to use. If I replaces it with an almost bran new kit lens do you think I would se a difference ? Or do you think I can get something else like a cannon 35mm lens for relatively the same cost ? I actually enjoy my 90-300 as it's a usm it has quite a nice and accurate feel to it. I don't have much use for a big lens like it but it nice to know its there.
Could part of my problem be with my camera body, should I get it professionally cleaned and calibrated as I feel there is a lot of noise in my photos especially if it's anything but ISO 100 ,or is it all simply not worth it?
So I have so many questions and they are all hidden in really long boring stories.
Okay so ever since I really took an interest in photography I have just not being hitting the mark in image quality and sharpness and even just nice full rich colours. I think I kind of know the answers to my problems but would love to know some more from the community.
Camera body: I have a cannon 500d (bought second hand with a relatively high shutter count)
Lenses: first of all I have two lenses I got from my dads old collection they are probably 10years old, one is a kit lens 18-55mm f3.5 and the other is a cannon 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 and lastly I bought an old school prime lens by yashica it's a 50mm f2
The yashica has a few spots and specks on the inside of the lens so I will be dismantling it when my cleaning kit arrives but is by far my favourite lens, of course I had no idea about crop sensors or anything when I bought it so it's more like a 70 something mm so I would like to maybe get a 28mm next probably a "vintage" lens again. the kit lens seems to be the one I have the most trouble with as I use it quiet a lot for its wider angle range. I've never thought the af was any good on it and it's just horrible lens to use. If I replaces it with an almost bran new kit lens do you think I would se a difference ? Or do you think I can get something else like a cannon 35mm lens for relatively the same cost ? I actually enjoy my 90-300 as it's a usm it has quite a nice and accurate feel to it. I don't have much use for a big lens like it but it nice to know its there.
Could part of my problem be with my camera body, should I get it professionally cleaned and calibrated as I feel there is a lot of noise in my photos especially if it's anything but ISO 100 ,or is it all simply not worth it?
So I have so many questions and they are all hidden in really long boring stories.