Just drop a chick in a bikini in there and you are good.
Personally, I'd much rather it be a handsome, athletic dude in swim trunks, but yeah...
I'm gonna differ just a LITTLE on the prevailing opinion here.
THIS specific shot is not that "special"--but whether or not this TYPE of shot is even worth doing:
"There is nothing new under the sun." MOST subjects have been "overdone"--photographed again and again and again, from all sorts of different angles, with different lighting, etc. Waves at the beach, waterfalls, the deer at the edge of the woods, the Eiffel Tower, Stonehenge, a mountain stream, ad infinitum--it's ALL been done before. Sometimes, as in this case, done so often that it's "boring."
But all that means, imo, is that it's probably NOT worth taking these shots if your goal is to sell them. But it doesn't mean it's not worth photographing.
There have been approximately 426 bazillion flower photos taken. THIS year. But my mother would still rather have a 16x20 flower photo taken by ME than someone else's. And truth be told, *I* would rather hang up my OWN photos than someone else's.
So, if you like photos of waves at the beach, what difference does it make if it's overdone? None of those other many, many photos of waves are YOuRS.