Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The 200-400 isnt in my price range.
I read Nasim's review and i didnt understand one bit. Ive underlined it in the image, can anyone explain it to me?
View attachment 63848
maybe because it's a bunch of nonsense?I read Nasim's review and i didnt understand one bit. Ive underlined it in the image, can anyone explain it to me?
View attachment 63848
maybe because it's a bunch of nonsense?I read Nasim's review and i didnt understand one bit. Ive underlined it in the image, can anyone explain it to me?
View attachment 63848
He's first stating that the 300mm with the 1.4TC at 420mm is sharper at f/5.6 than the 80-400mm, but it's only just as sharp once either is stopped down.
cool.
But then he's suggesting that it's important to remember that the 300mm + 1.4TC equalling 420mm gives you a narrower field of view than the 500mm of the 80-400mm.
uh?
I *think* the 500mm was a typo, where he was saying you're comparing 400mm vs 420mm so it's not apple to apples -- that you have an extra 20mm of reach with the 300 + 1.4TC.
but then he goes and says it again in his conclusion: Because of the lens breathing issue on the 80-400mm AF-S, the Nikon 300mm f/4D gives more reach with the TC-14E II attached, so 420mm on the 300mm f/4D is more like 500mm on the 80-400mm AF-S at short distances (this changes as the distance increases).
I honestly have no idea what he's trying to say here.