What's new

C&C Por Favor

I'm saving everything clanthar just said into a Word document. Very valuable information there. I will inevitably need to know this once I make the switch to DSLR and start getting more serious about photography. Thank you for the information.
 
Ok, this thread just made it worth my while poking around TPF tonight. Thank you Tkot for asking the original question, and to Lew and especially Clanthar for some very good information.
 
If I was ever good at anything, it was asking the right questions, haha! Good think I ran into these guys who are so good at answering them!
 
A Raw image file isn't actually an image, it's just a data file until it the image data is converted into something more than just 10100011010111101011010101010101010111011111.

Most Raw converters allow parametric editing. Parametric editing does not change any of the original pixles and is also known as non-destructive editing.

Parametric edits are line commands used by the Raw converter in the conversion process. Adobe Camera Raw writes those line commands in to a 'sidecar' .XMP file.

A Raw image data file is indeed 'processed'.

Most digital cameras use an image sensor that cannot record colors and of course the image sensor is an analog device, not a digital device.

The image sensor has a color filter array in front of it, known as a Bayer Array. The Bayer array is designed so that a 4 pixel square has 2 pixels covered by green filters, 1 pixel covered by a red filter, and 1 pixel covered by a blue pixel, like this;
BayerArray.png


A 10 MP image sensor would have 2.5 million more of these 4 pixel square color filter arrays in front of it. By the way, they use 2 green color filters because the human eye is most sensitive to green light.

Note that the pixels do not record the color of the filter that is in front of them, but the color of the filter influences the luminosity of the light the pixel records, and the colors in the photo are later inferred by a demosaicing algorithm. Each Raw converter application uses a slightly different demosaicing algorithm to infer the colors, so the various Raw converters all look slight different from each other.

There is another type of image sensor, but it is not used in to many digital cameras. it is called the Foveon image sensor. Instead of a color filter array the Foveon sensor takes advantage of the fact that the color of light effects how deeply it can penetrate a slice of silicon. So a Foveon uses 3 layers of pixels, with each layer of pixels at a different depth in the silicon wafer.
 
Last edited:
Interesting! Man, when I'm ready/need to start shooting in RAW, I'm coming right back to this thread to read up on things!
 
IMO, try sharpening (unsharp mask) the first. Using 0.4 radius with 55% amount..so the stamen look sharper.

Some shots from today. Tell me what you think!

#1
DSC_0026.jpg

#2
DSC_0028.jpg

#3
DSC_0063.jpg
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom