Chelsea Hanson

[DGMPhotography]

Check out Chelsea!

1.............................. 2 ................................ 3 ...............................4 ................................... 5


What do you think?

 

[Rick50]

Like the pose in #2 followed by #5. #3 is the worst (full on). So 2-5-4-1-3.

 

[ronlane]

I think you've been around enough to know that posing a lady square to the camera as in #3 is not a good idea.

 

[JohnnyWrench]

I like the pulp feel of the red dress shot. Number 3 should be deleted.

 

[FITBMX]

#2 #4 #5 are the best of the set.
That red dress really looks good on her!

 

[bribrius]

4,2,5,1 for me and agree on the 3 problem

 

[DGMPhotography]

A lot of haters on #3... I am well aware of the rule to shoot women from angles, but I decided to break that rule because I wanted to go for "powerful."

 

[tirediron]

A lot of haters on #3... I am well aware of the rule to shoot women from angles, but I decided to break that rule because I wanted to go for "powerful."

Okay... BUT... you've posed her below the viewer's eye-level, with her lucking up toward the viewer. This is a subservient pose. Had you had her looking down and shot from below, up, toward her, you would have nailed it.

 

[DGMPhotography]

A lot of haters on #3... I am well aware of the rule to shoot women from angles, but I decided to break that rule because I wanted to go for "powerful."

Okay... BUT... you've posed her below the viewer's eye-level, with her lucking up toward the viewer. This is a subservient pose. Had you had her looking down and shot from below, up, toward her, you would have nailed it.

Ah, good point.

 

[Granddad]

I think number 1 is under rated. It's the only one that shows her rather superior posterior asset.

 

[JohnnyWrench]

I think number 1 is under rated. It's the only one that shows her rather superior posterior asset.

Well said Granddad!

 

[DGMPhotography]

I think number 1 is under rated. It's the only one that shows her rather superior posterior asset.

Lol.... I have better ones..

 

[ronlane]

I think number 1 is under rated. It's the only one that shows her rather superior posterior asset.

Lol.... I have better ones..

Well, waiting....

 

[DGMPhotography]

I think number 1 is under rated. It's the only one that shows her rather superior posterior asset.

Lol.... I have a better one..

Well, waiting....

Ask and ye shall receive I suppose..