Matt:
I've tried to stay out of this thread, mostly because I know I have a really vested interest in chiropractic, mostly because that's what I'm going to school to be. However, while your assessment of this particular chiropractor, (full of it,) may be spot on, he is, in fact correct about most MD's.
In fact the AMA orchestrated a direct, dedicated, and purposeful movement to discredit and stamp out chiropractic, regardless of research that chiropractic is indeed safe and valid. The AMA sent out memo's to member physicians stating it was "unethical to give or receive referrals to or from a chiropractor." This is absolutely false, to the tune of some $95,000,000.00 awarded to chiropractors in a lawsuit against the AMA in the early 1990s. So there is an actual basis to what this chiro said to you.
I'm sorry you had a bad experience, but there those of us that are well educated, with the exact same education as MD's, (in fact I have more hours in biochemistry and microbiology in my coursework than the average medical school). I've already begun building a referral base with local pediatricians (I specialize in pediatric chiropractic,) and have several physicians I already work closely with.
It is true there are bad chiropractors out there. There are also bad MD's out there as well. The difference is, a bad chiropractor might scam you out of some of your money, while a bad MD can easily kill you.
To the original poster:
There is no process that doesn't take time.
Consider this. If you were going to a medical doctor, your first visit would be mostly talking, and some xrays, or MRI. Then he'd probably write you a prescription, or refer you to a surgeon. Your first visit to the surgeon would probably be a mostly talking, maybe some more advanced imaging. My point is that you criticize the chiroprator for talking with you, and trying to include you in your own treatment. It's conservative treatment, and non-invasive. It doesn't damage your body, and it may very well help. Where's the downside?