What's new

Constructive Criticism please!

It may be bland and boring to you but I promise good photos can be made from it.
 
Kevin,

I tend not to give technical advice about photos because I don't feel like I'm in the position, experience wise, to do so. But I will tell you some things I have observed/learned while lurking in this forum.

People tend to find this forum through a google search (as I did) and get really excited about posting their pics from their brand new spiffy camera, or even sometimes from an older one and they want other people's opinions so they can improve. A lot of time they also want people to tell them their photos are good... or at the very least that they are improving. Usually, though, they are not very good. But that's OK. That's normal. We all start somewhere. The problem I think people run into is they rely on the feedback too much. As newbies, we tend to go out, take some shots for practice or because we find something interesting (although we don't know why we find it interesting) or because it looks "cool" in the camera and throw them on the forum and expect people to critique the photo bearing in mind our current experience level. Well, people tend not to critique that way. They call like they see it. I'm not saying people can't learn from it, because they can... people do. But I noticed when I stopped asking for people's critique on each new photo I got excited about, and started paying attention to other photos that I knew were good, I started to become a better photographer without other people telling me what to do. I naturally started to figure it out on my own.

We all have certain circumstances, but I think Bitter said it well when he said "Why take shots that you already know will fail because of your limitations, and post them for CC? You are not "making do"." People posts photos "just because", without any understanding about why they took the photo in the first place, other than practice. We all need to practice, but in general, don't post THOSE pics up for critique... you're just going to get ripped to shreds. And, as Bitter said, don't take a picture knowing there are flaws because of time of day, lack of equipment, or whatever other excuse... and then expect people to critique with those limitations in mind. People critique a photo based on if it's a good photo... not if it's a good photo under the circumstances.

This isn't directed at YOU, per se. I just wanted to share what I have observed. I really think if people spent more time taking photos (tons of them), reading books, and looking at other good photos rather then wondering what everyone thinks of their own photos, they will notice they will improve much faster.

To clarify, I'm not saying critique doesn't have it's place. This is a great place to learn. I just think some people need to advantage of it (critiques) less.

Just my 2 cents.
 
-shrug-
I've searched all over this basement several times, looking for something interesting to shoot. Nothing comes out well, at all.

Also,
thanks Jands
 
I totally agree with jands. I rarely put photos up anymore. Hopefully I'll have some decent shots in the future but I know I'm taking junk right now and don't need 1,000 or so people to say, "Yep, it's junk." :sexywink:
 
Yeah, it definitely seems like it's you that is the problem now buddy. You have to get an eye for photography, the most expensive camera in the world will still net you bland subjects. Sometimes, I feel you are pushing to take pics to get CC/show off and not actually listening to what others are telling you, you actually remind me a lot of an older member that used to (and still does) edit their photos ridiculously. He would concentrate more on editing crazy than actually getting a good shot. He's still that way and pops in every once in a while, but seems like he has gone onto another site that praises whatever he puts up.
 
Not sure if the reference towards the older member would be me editing my photos..considering most of the time I won't even PP any of them..but I can see what you're saying.
I do listen to what others are saying, but it seems more people are telling me what to shoot, then they are how to better shoot what I can.

Anyways,
here's me going around my room looking for things to shoot.
5.jpg


4-1.jpg


3-2.jpg


2-1.jpg


1.jpg
 
Those are some of your best pictures right there...

#1, pan up or zoom out, get the flame in the shot.
#4 is very good. PS out the little specks and you have a good abstract IMO.
#5 is either OOF or motion blurr, otherwise it's good as well. Exposure time of 1 sec, motion blur it is. MUCH too long.
 
I'm actually surprisingly happy with this one.
14pc95.jpg
 
In a month's time you have 445 posts. If you continue to say I can't, we will start to say we won't.
BTW light bulb is your most interesting subject so far.
 
^^^ still massively tilted.

Water finds its own level, but hills and mountains do not. Level on the WATER... not the horizon.

There is such things as slopes and hills... Why does the slope have to be level? As long as the water is I think it's good.
I like the edit. If only the pic were in focus...

Wow. Seriously? Wow.

The... picture... is... not... level.

I'm not telling you to flatten the hills. I'm not Bo Duke. I'm telling you to look at the water and see that it's slanted and understand that water doesn't do that. Hills do. Level the water, you level the picture.
 
^Remove all of the specks...

I tried! I spent 10 minutes just content-aware filling the ones I could see! haha it doesn't help that my screen is dirty and has specks all over it either =/
I lazyyy
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom