Cornfield sunset

[Primoz]

It's one I have taken this summer in Norway, but haven't showed it yet. What do you think? Thanks for opinions!

The quality is a bit poor, as I have resized it for web use.

 

[HikinMike]

I find the lens flair is a bit distracting. I just wish there where a few clouds or a better foreground.

 

[Frequency]

Starry sun worked well; its streak reaching the bottom end adds beauty; but as mentioned those polygonal light patches do not help

Regards

 

[starcluster]

Yes! agree on the starry sun, and to lighten it up a little bit from the bottom

 

[Primoz]

Thanks for opinions. Better so?

 

[Frequency]

Now that goes Classic

Regards

 

[Primoz]

Here is another one for you to judge: (The sky seems a bit off due to resizing )

 

[Frequency]

This is doubtless wonderful

I see some striations in sky which you can remove in PP

I am a man of under exposure; here you too do it that way; if you brighten it up, i think this may turn magical

Regards

 

[myshkin]

The redo on the first pic is much nicer. I like it alot.

The blue sky in the second pic is distracting with the lines

 

[Primoz]

The redo on the first pic is much nicer. I like it alot.

The blue sky in the second pic is distracting with the lines

Yes, I know. As I said it became so after the export of the image. In LR it looks fine. Any idea why?

 

[myshkin]

I have had the same problem with really blue skys. I also dont see it in LR3 but do once I save for web. I hope someone can answer this

 

[Frequency]

I tried this on PS by selective brightening of the sky and some clone; this is only suggestive since my PS works are never meticulous; so kindly work it out more effectively than this( i will withdraw my modification soon)

 

[DirtyDFeckers]

I tried this on PS by selective brightening of the sky and some clone; this is only suggestive since my PS works are never meticulous; so kindly work it out more effectively than this( i will withdraw my modification soon)

This edit doesn't look nearly as good as the original.

To the OP, I like both of these shots very much, particularly the 2nd one. I actually think the level of underexposure suits the "mood" of the image very nicely. Great work.

 

[Frequency]

To be frank, me too loves the original; but many people love brightened images; only to satisfy both group i recommended the variation I am no body to say which liking is more refined; further an expert in PS can do the same brightening in a more sophisticated way

Regards