Val
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hey guys. I searched around for comparisons of different NR settings and what effect they have on the image at different ISOs on Nikon D300, but didnt find anything. So i did a quick one myself.
Configuration:
Lens Nikkor 50/1.8 @ /4
JPG normal quality optimised, vivid +3 sat, d-lightning normal
A mode, -2/3 compensation
All images are exactly as shot, cropped and reduced in PS using bicubic sharper. Saved as JPGs at 10/12 compression.
Test picture:
Below is the images showing all possible NR and ISO combinations. ISOs go from top to bottom in full stops: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400. NRs go from left to right: OFF, LOW, NORMAL and HIGH.
This image is a 50% reduced version for easy viewing. Follow this link for 100% crops (1.1 meg file):
http://www.lotusclub.org/images/photo/comparison.jpg
My conclusion from these is that ISO 1600 with NORMAL NR is the sweetspot for general photography. However id like to point your attention to something else.
If we analyse background slightly higher then those crops, we will see gradient separation at NORMAL NR even at ISO 800. Here is a comparison:
Hence my choice is using ISO 1600 with LOW NR. Image is not distractingly noisy, preserves excellent detail and can still be processed rather well should i need it for something.
Hope you guys find this helpful! :thumbup:
Configuration:
Lens Nikkor 50/1.8 @ /4
JPG normal quality optimised, vivid +3 sat, d-lightning normal
A mode, -2/3 compensation
All images are exactly as shot, cropped and reduced in PS using bicubic sharper. Saved as JPGs at 10/12 compression.
Test picture:

Below is the images showing all possible NR and ISO combinations. ISOs go from top to bottom in full stops: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400. NRs go from left to right: OFF, LOW, NORMAL and HIGH.
This image is a 50% reduced version for easy viewing. Follow this link for 100% crops (1.1 meg file):
http://www.lotusclub.org/images/photo/comparison.jpg

My conclusion from these is that ISO 1600 with NORMAL NR is the sweetspot for general photography. However id like to point your attention to something else.
If we analyse background slightly higher then those crops, we will see gradient separation at NORMAL NR even at ISO 800. Here is a comparison:

Hence my choice is using ISO 1600 with LOW NR. Image is not distractingly noisy, preserves excellent detail and can still be processed rather well should i need it for something.
Hope you guys find this helpful! :thumbup: