D-B-J
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,027
- Reaction score
- 2,175
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I have no experience with the A7, but am pretty happy with my results with the D810. It's good to see Sony really stepping up the game for real. I'm always impressed by Sony results in general. And as far as I know, my D810 has a Sony sensor inside as well, which I am pretty happy about.
But I hope you guys don't start a fight here (D810 vs A7), otherwise the D4S, DF, D750 and D610 folks will soon join the high ISO fight too... hehehehe -- And that's not idea here.
Looks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
Looks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
All i see is numbers no examples so to me that is bullshit
No thankyou I will just shoot, its prints that should be looked atLooks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
All i see is numbers no examples so to me that is bullshit
Numbers are used in conjunction with examples. Get over yourself and learn to read them instead of dismissing them. Use them in combination with other reviews to inform your decision.
That's like saying you don't believe in global warming because all you see are statistics and numbers and no "examples." Ha! What a laugh.
No thankyou I will just shoot, its prints that should be looked atLooks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
All i see is numbers no examples so to me that is bullshit
Numbers are used in conjunction with examples. Get over yourself and learn to read them instead of dismissing them. Use them in combination with other reviews to inform your decision.
That's like saying you don't believe in global warming because all you see are statistics and numbers and no "examples." Ha! What a laugh.
DXO looks like it is sponsored by Nikon its a joke, there is anothe post with tests where D810 didn't come out as good as A7 so none of them can be trustwNo thankyou I will just shoot, its prints that should be looked atLooks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
All i see is numbers no examples so to me that is bullshit
Numbers are used in conjunction with examples. Get over yourself and learn to read them instead of dismissing them. Use them in combination with other reviews to inform your decision.
That's like saying you don't believe in global warming because all you see are statistics and numbers and no "examples." Ha! What a laugh.
Whatever makes you happy. Just don't dismiss valid metrics for no logical reason, thanks [emoji5]️[emoji106]
Jake
DXO looks like it is sponsored by Nikon its a joke, there is anothe post with tests where D810 didn't come out as good as A7 so none of them can be trustwNo thankyou I will just shoot, its prints that should be looked atLooks on a par with Sony A7 with no noise reduction
Yeah, in fantasy land.
Nikon D810 versus Sony A7 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark
All i see is numbers no examples so to me that is bullshit
Numbers are used in conjunction with examples. Get over yourself and learn to read them instead of dismissing them. Use them in combination with other reviews to inform your decision.
That's like saying you don't believe in global warming because all you see are statistics and numbers and no "examples." Ha! What a laugh.
Whatever makes you happy. Just don't dismiss valid metrics for no logical reason, thanks [emoji5]️[emoji106]
Jake
We are talking about sensors, not cameras. Stay on track, sir.Best sensor for what ? It is not the vest camera for most things I shoot