ryanwaff
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 186
- Reaction score
- 50
- Location
- South Africa
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Recently I have been looking at alot of photographers work mainly on 500px and have been trying to work out their 'style'.
And with some of them, their 'style' of editing and shooting is quite obvious and you can see that they have selected what they like to shoot and how they like to edit those shots. Where as with others their photography is more broad, same goes for their editing. One thing I have noticed is that those who have defined their style tend to stick with one or two genre's whereas those who don't really have a defined style don't.
So my question is by defining your photographic are you limiting your photography to your 'comfort zone' of shooting? Thus limiting your further growth as a photographer because you aren't trying anything new?
I do realize that by narrowing your focus and style you could become one of the 'masters' in that style, which is generally better than being a 'jack of all trades'?
I guess the reason for this thinking is that I read a quote recently that said something along the lines of:' being human is about creation, if we dont create we wont feel as fulfilled or get the most enjoyment out of life.' And that got me thinking about if you have your genre that you specialised in, will there not come a point where your photography will 'freeze' and no longer fulfill you s much because you are no longer having to stretch yourself to create?
So yay or nay for defining your style and why?
And with some of them, their 'style' of editing and shooting is quite obvious and you can see that they have selected what they like to shoot and how they like to edit those shots. Where as with others their photography is more broad, same goes for their editing. One thing I have noticed is that those who have defined their style tend to stick with one or two genre's whereas those who don't really have a defined style don't.
So my question is by defining your photographic are you limiting your photography to your 'comfort zone' of shooting? Thus limiting your further growth as a photographer because you aren't trying anything new?
I do realize that by narrowing your focus and style you could become one of the 'masters' in that style, which is generally better than being a 'jack of all trades'?
I guess the reason for this thinking is that I read a quote recently that said something along the lines of:' being human is about creation, if we dont create we wont feel as fulfilled or get the most enjoyment out of life.' And that got me thinking about if you have your genre that you specialised in, will there not come a point where your photography will 'freeze' and no longer fulfill you s much because you are no longer having to stretch yourself to create?
So yay or nay for defining your style and why?