Do we need a macro sub-section

[Joves]

Id say sub it with nature. Which is usually what a majority of the macros are.

 

[Overread]

true that there is a lot of macro work in nature, but still there is the whole area of abstract macro to consider. I think it better that they are both lumped together for simplicities sake - granted its going to fill up with insects quick, but there will be space for other kinds

 

[TwoRails]

Agreed on that.

 

[Dmitri]

I don't see a need for it, and I think it will reduce traffic to both itself and other areas.

Someone said, either here or in another thread, that the more forums and sub-forums you have, the less people will be seeing them. I think most people (like myself) stick to one or two forums that we enjoy most (for me, landscapes, and wildlife).

In any case, I don't see a need to create a new thread and further water down views/replies.

 

[Overread]

*begs*
we promise to be very very good

 

[matt-l]

Cookies for those who agree!!!