Dont know what lens I should get

Amoore00357

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
I am trying to decide what lens i should get for my canon 60D for good wildlife and bird shots that are farther away.
I have done research on both canon 100-400 lens and the sigma 150-500 and i don't know which one i should get.
I also want to know if anyone has had problems with ether of these lenses. Thanks.
 
In that price range Canon has 3 offerings for you:

100-400mm IS L - offers you a wide zoom range and image stabilization. This lens is good quality and the only canon one to give you a zoom range - however optically speaking its the weakest of the three at the long end (it is of course still L grade and thus, whilst the lowest of the 3 its still high quality). This lens has had a troubled past and quality control on it (and mostly any other superzoom lens) can be a bit iffy - its much better now than in its early days of release however and most copies are good - if you get a softer copy sending your camera into canon with the lens should resolve the issue (and under warranty).

300mm f4 IS L (+1.4TC) - offers IS and a good focal range. This is the prime choice if you want the IS support, either bare as a 300mm or as a 420mm with the 1.4TC its the next up on the quality list (at the 420mm mark).

400mm f5.6 L - The top quality in terms of sharpness at this price range, though it lacks the IS (a monopod/tripod makes up for this easily) it has a longer native reach and really is the optically best at the 400mm mark.


In short you've got to choose the right tool to fit your needs - if you want a zoom the 100-400mm; if you want a sharp prime with IS the 300mm+TC and if you want the longest and sharpest and don't worry about zoom nor IS then the 400mm f5.6.
Far as I know the sigma offering is about on par with the canon 100-400mm in terms of optical quality (100-400mm might have the edge, but after processing won't be that different if at all). Note also that whilst its listed as a 500mm the max range at most distances is closer to around 450mm, which is not a big difference from 400mm bare.
 
Im leaning to the Sigma because of the cost.
I am not professional so its mostly a hobby on the side thing so i am not really ready to invest in a very high dollar lens but i will take think about those choices. Thanks
 
Long wildlife lenses are one area where going higher can give you a big, noticeable difference - its one of the areas of photography where the higher grade lenses really are worth their weight to get hold of. for what its worth I know a lot of photographers, amateur/hobbyist who use these lenses.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top