Emily Catherine... Shot by Emily Rose...

[e.rose]

Sorry. I just get a kick out of the fact that the model's name is Emily too... when I posted this to Facebook, so many people were confused as to who was who. :lmao:

Anyway, here is another set I did... what?... Like 2 months ago? Something like that...

Figured I'd share.

Same thing as last time... comment, don't comment, C&C, spin in a circle... whatever you want. :lmao:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

I always have such a hard time deciding what to post here. If you're feeling adventurous, check out the rest of the set here: Emily Catherine | Fashion Rocks - a set on Flickr


KTHANKSBYE! :hug::

 

[amolitor]

Nicely done, they look to me like fine examples of the form. The poses look a little awkward, but I get the sense that you're not going for swan-like grace here. I think the work might have benefited from the model hitting the attitude a little harder. If she's gonna pose like a rIoT GRRRl she should emote like one, perhaps?

What's up with her skin in the last one, directly in front of her ear? Is that stray hair, or was she hideously burned as a child? This last also suffers from a little problem with separation of the model from the background, but otherwise it's a very strong shot.

 

[e.rose]

Nicely done, they look to me like fine examples of the form. The poses look a little awkward, but I get the sense that you're not going for swan-like grace here. I think the work might have benefited from the model hitting the attitude a little harder. If she's gonna pose like a rIoT GRRRl she should emote like one, perhaps?

What's up with her skin in the last one, directly in front of her ear? Is that stray hair, or was she hideously burned as a child? This last also suffers from a little problem with separation of the model from the background, but otherwise it's a very strong shot.

Thanks for your feedback. :sillysmi: And yeah, we weren't going for swan-like grace, haha. I agree she could probably had a touch more attitude.

As far as the last image... Uh... there's stray hair... and ... a shadow? No burn I'm not sure exactly what part of the skin you're referring to... But directly in front of her ear are the, what I call, "baby hairs", if that's the area you mean.

Want me to post another 100% crop?

 

[BuS_RiDeR]

Good work. :thumbup:

 

[e.rose]

Good work. :thumbup:

Thanks. :sillysmi:

 

[Derrel]

Some of the best photographs I've seen all week. Period.

 

[e.rose]

Some of the best photographs I've seen all week. Period.

Lies.

But thank you.

 

[jaomul]

Nice shots, lots of attitude, well done

 

[e.rose]

Nice shots, lots of attitude, well done

Thank you

 

[amolitor]

Well, I thought about suggesting that it was hair on her actual cheek, but women are often sensitive to mention of such things, so I delicately dodged around it. By suggesting that it was a hideous burn

Not sure I'd have left it in. On the one hand, it's what she looks like, on the other hand it doesn't fit with either RiOT GrRrRl or high fashion model, so. Eh.

Anyways, you're on top of it and you made a conscious choice and that's the important thing. It's when stuff's slipping by you that you get in trouble.

 

[Mully]

Very nice shoot... I especially like the last two!

 

[e.rose]

Well, I thought about suggesting that it was hair on her actual cheek, but women are often sensitive to mention of such things, so I delicately dodged around it. By suggesting that it was a hideous burn

Not sure I'd have left it in. On the one hand, it's what she looks like, on the other hand it doesn't fit with either RiOT GrRrRl or high fashion model, so. Eh.

Anyways, you're on top of it and you made a conscious choice and that's the important thing. It's when stuff's slipping by you that you get in trouble.

No, my sensitivity lies within comments about weight. :lmao: Body hair... not so much.

And yes, that's hair on her check... and I have a confession to make:

Yes, it was a conscious choice to leave it in, but the only reason I made that choice is because I am not adept enough in PS to take out all the little hairs cleanly enough. Maybe I just need to be more patient with the clone tool... I dunno. Any suggestions for that would be greatly appreciated though!

Very nice shoot... I especially like the last two!

Thanks Mully! :sillysmi:

 

[Derrel]

Clone at 45-50% opacity with a flow of about 15%. Use a somewhat large,soft-edged brush, like 30-45 pixels. It's almost like applying "foundation"...digital foundation!!! Do lots of brief mouse-clicks, so that you can un-do if if needed. This was done with a 21-pixel soft-edge brush, at 45% opacity, 15% flow.

 

[e.rose]

Thanks, I'll give that a try next time.

 

[cgipson1]

Sweet! Miz E.. you are rockin that camera! And I want to meet your models.... lol!