Jim Walczak
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 226
- Reaction score
- 90
- Location
- Lorain, Ohio
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I originally thought Blade Runner was rubbish because of the voice over, so much so I gave up on it after about 40 minutes. Later when the directors cut came out I gave it another go and loved it. I read afterwards that neither Ridley Scott or Harrison Ford wanted the narrative in, but that it was thought by the film company that the film needed extra explaining to the audience. As a result Harrison Ford apparently admitted years later that he did the narrative in as dreary and boring a voice as he could possibly do without making it to obvious, in the hope that they would not use it.
Yea, I'm just the opposite there. I -like- the voice over...always have. Again I feel it gives the film that noir feel that simply doesn't exist without it. That said, I have always been a great fan of both sci-fi AND noir, so to me it was a brilliant combination of the two. The narrative in Blade Runner could have started out with the classic "It was a dark and stormy night..." (as apposed to "Sushi...") which would have been equally appropriate, LOL! I also feel the narrative explains a few details that get left out of the visual telling of the story (which I suspect was the studio's view point as well). Yea, perhaps it's a tad cliche, however I personally feel it makes the film...it's what gives the film that "Philip Marlow" 30's/40's detective feel and I really don't think the film would have ever reached the cult classic status it has today had the narrative of been excluded originally.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.....