Unless the shot is a full-lenbgth shot, there'sgoing to be some cropping of limbs.
Regarding shot #1 and her legs: I thought the bottom of the frame cut-off point of shot #1 was pretty good; I might have cropped it even a bit higher, to show a bit less of the bottom of the thigh. Cropping off a bit more of the bottom would have visually slimmed down the thigh, by literally showing less of it in the picture! But there's a balance...showing the knees and the thigh creates a certain type of appeal to a certain percentage of the populaton, and shows the type of clothing she was actually wearing, so there's that issue.
If one looks on-line there are some Classic Rules of Cropping regarding where it is okay to crop and where it is frowned upon to crop a person's body and or limbs or joints. Honestly, I think those rules carry a lot less weight in 2017 than they did in 1899. I think by now we realize that we're dealing with photographic representations of people, and that we're not really lopping off fingers, etc. Still...the issue does come up a lot.