First picture ever taken at f32..

[DaPOPO]

I took this picture at f32 at approximately 1823 hours. The pole and street pole banner is approximately 1/16th of a mile east of the city hall.

I am actually pretty happy with how in focus both the street banner and the building are.

I used my Nikon D7100 with a my nikon 50mm 1.8d set at iso 200, 1/15, f32 on a tripod.

 

[Derrel]

When you need depth of field, f/32 gives it to you.

 

[480sparky40 39]

Nikon 50/1.8 D? F/32? ....

 

[Designer]

Nikon 50/1.8 D? F/32? ....

Maybe he meant to write f/22.

 

[480sparky40 39]

Nikon 50/1.8 D? F/32? ....

Maybe he meant to write f/22.

EXIF says f/32. I'm stumped as to how that's possible.

 

[Derrel]

Nikon 50/1.8 D? F/32? ....

Maybe he meant to write f/22.

EXIF says f/32. I'm stumped as to how that's possible.

My 50/1.8 only goes to F-22 but the exif information does say f/32...so...perhaps he was using a telconnverter or an old 55 micro? I dunno' and I really don't care too much.

 

[480sparky40 39]

Nikon 50/1.8 D? F/32? ....

Maybe he meant to write f/22.

EXIF says f/32. I'm stumped as to how that's possible.

My 50/1.8 only goes to F-22 but the exif information does say f/32...so...

Mine too. Maybe it's a set of custom aperture blades.

Or it's a lens used by Spinal Tap.

 

[K9Kirk]

Nice shot. I don't know anything about a Nikon D7100 and it's limitations but my Canon D80 goes up to f/32 so apparently it depends on the camera as to whether it will go above F/22 or not. It's understandable why you used 1/15th and on a tripod when there's fairly good light. Good job.

 

[480sparky40 39]

..... so apparently it depends on the camera as to whether it will go above F/22 or not.........

That's a new one. A lens goes to f/22 on one body, and f/32 on another.

Anyone want to buy a bridge I've got for sale in Brooklyn?

 

[Designer]

.. apparently it depends on the camera as to whether it will go above F/22 or not.

The readout that you see on your camera is getting that aperture number from the lens that you have mounted.

 

[K9Kirk]

.. apparently it depends on the camera as to whether it will go above F/22 or not.

The readout that you see on your camera is getting that aperture number from the lens that you have mounted.

I was wondering about that so

..... so apparently it depends on the camera as to whether it will go above F/22 or not.........

That's a new one. A lens goes to f/22 on one body, and f/32 on another.

Anyone want to buy a bridge I've got for sale in Brooklyn?

If a lens wants to "identify" as an f/32 that's it's business, lol! Hey, I totally misunderstood, never mind.

 

[480sparky40 39]

.......If a lens wants to "identify" as an f/32 that's it's business, lol! Hey, I totally misunderstood, never mind.

Then my 200-500 should identify as an f/0.4.

 

[K9Kirk]

.......If a lens wants to "identify" as an f/32 that's it's business, lol! Hey, I totally misunderstood, never mind.

Then my 200-500 should identify as an f/0.4.

Now wouldn't that be dandy!

 

[Lonnie1212]

This is an impressive picture! I like to see people do great things with DX cameras. Yesterday I took pictures with a Nikon D3200 with a 50 mm 1.8 lens. Keep up the good work. I hope to see more.

Thank you,

Lonnie

 

[TreeofLifeStairs]

So no word from the op on how he was able to get to f/32 with that lens?