- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 25,507
- Reaction score
- 5,113
- Location
- UK - England
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Moderator 🛠️
- #16
Macro is the commonly used area because there is no other method of increasing the depth of field without significant loss of quality from diffraction at smaller apertures.
For landscape it works well on very static scenes (eg buildings) but for a scene containing moving elements (even leaves in a very very light wind) you might find it a challenge as the leaves move between shots and the software might well throw up errors or problems with the stack. Some people do work with motion in macro work with this, but it generally involves a lot of clone and heal tool use to make each frame as similar as possible; with leaves in a scene however you'll be there for days at it.
You might well want to look up hyperfocal focusing as a method for generalist landscape work
For landscape it works well on very static scenes (eg buildings) but for a scene containing moving elements (even leaves in a very very light wind) you might find it a challenge as the leaves move between shots and the software might well throw up errors or problems with the stack. Some people do work with motion in macro work with this, but it generally involves a lot of clone and heal tool use to make each frame as similar as possible; with leaves in a scene however you'll be there for days at it.
You might well want to look up hyperfocal focusing as a method for generalist landscape work
. 