Free PORN...NUDE women and more

Discussion in 'Photographic Discussions' started by Battou, Nov 22, 2007.

  1. Josh66

    Josh66 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Well, I don't know if you would consider it porn or art (doesn't really seem like porn to me), but there are depictions of intercourse that go pretty far back too. I think it's pretty safe to say that sex acts have been displayed as art recently too.


     
  2. BigRC

    BigRC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are absolutely correct, but I meant accepted in the mainstream by the masses. Sorry, I should have worded that better.
     
  3. Battou

    Battou TPF junkie!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,049
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I personally would be taking a lot of individual facets into consideration, I love both types of the imagery and spend a lot of time viewing them, how ever my personnel preferences are not the wether I call it porn or nude art. I stand in a position where I may have to make a decision on society's point of view. Many times (though not always) such an image displayed as art is deemed porn by society.
     
  4. Josh66

    Josh66 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I don't think it really matters what society's point of view is. Art has many faces, and not all will be liked by the masses.
     
  5. Battou

    Battou TPF junkie!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,049
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Yes, but some one among those masses could quickly kill our funding, I started this thread to work on getting a general concensus as to how I could draw a line with out violating the tearms of agreement with sponcers but also at the same time allow all forms of creative works at the same time.
     
  6. BigRC

    BigRC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, if that's the case, I'd go with a cookie cutter regulation. No genitalia, and no blatant exploitation of the act of sexual intercourse (be sure to give examples, if you leave it up to assumption you're asking for trouble). Then if changes need to be made, so be it.
     
  7. Josh66

    Josh66 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I don't think you really can draw a firm line for that purpose. We all (well, most of us...I hope) instinctively know what we can post here, and what will get us in trouble - but how do you define that and put it in writing? I don't think you can.
     
  8. Battou

    Battou TPF junkie!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,049
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    That is basicly where I am sitting at right now, it's just not in black and white simply because even that pushes or exceeds some tearms. The way I did this the thread in the manor I did is simply because the ideologies of the group are more important to me at the moment than the what yall think others ideologies are. This way if I have to break some tearms I will have an educated reason as opposed to just cunsensus of assumption. As well as to learn just how acceptable they really are with out comming right out and giving them.

    *EDIT*
    That's why I brought it up for discussion, I don't think I can either but I feel it needs to be done in order to survive as what the site was ment to be.
     
  9. Josh66

    Josh66 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    That oughta be interesting... ;)
     
  10. Big Bully

    Big Bully TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Burley ID
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    As in terms of the human body I think that we (American's) are uptight because we typically don't see it. The human form is always covered, unless you are lucky enough to find a nudist beach or camp, or hotel. (And they do exsist in our country) In Europe you have public nude beaches, and I don't know about the rest of Europe, but I know that Denmark has page 9 in their newspaper. So the nude form in your society is norm. If the US had more nude beaches and that was acceptable then I really don't think the naked form would be such a big deal, and the porn industry would actually go down.
    It is just like the guy in Atlanta said I think on page 1, when he even thinks of looking at a picture of a naked girl he gets excited. I think that is due to the fact that we, even with our "Britney Spears, Linsey Lohan, Paris Hilton" wannabe's are truely a covered nation. Which is sad, because the human body is an art form in itself.
    But if you need a cookie cutter answer on what is classified as "porn" or not. Leave it simple just like BigRC said, Porn is classified as showing a sex act, or genitalia male or female.
    If you leave it up to a persons "best judgement" you will have those that will want to push the envelope. People always toe that line, and try to push it farther and farther. Which is half the reason porn is somewhat acceptable in todays world. Like I said I have had people tell me that the pictures I posted above, are considered porn, and indecent. So if you draw a line, stick to it. But keep it simple.
     
  11. ShePaintsOrange

    ShePaintsOrange TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Elmer Batters, wasn't he the foot fetish guy?
    We used to sell his photo books in a store that I worked at, they came 'packaged' in a nylon stocking.

    I don't think you can say that by showing genitalia that it makes it pornography. At a dinner party a photographer friend had her new prints spread out over the table, we were all trying to figure out how she took these wonderful abstract prints, turns out they were close ups of her girlfriends genital piercings. Now my friends are pervy enough to eventually figure it out, but to the average viewer, they just looked like wonderful black and white abstracts. Frankly, if I could afford one of them, I would purchase it and hang it above my sofa, none of my elderly neighbors visiting for a cup of tea would ever be the wiser.
     
  12. karissa

    karissa The Untitled

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,426
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Probably at work... *yawn*
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    Haha! I clicked on it thinking it was spam that hadn't been reported yet. :p
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

freepornnudewomen

,

naked woman in wichita ks

,
nude female pics in wichita ks
,

nude women goddard ks

,

nude women pics in goddard ks

,

nudewomengoddardks

,
pornnudewomen images
,
wichita ks nudes