Girl in bikini (NSFW!)

If the girl's dream is to become a porn star, you just have to deal with the fact she might not be the sharpest tool in the shed. I shoot girls that think they are models because they are pretty. (or they think they are pretty) I've made them slowly say their vowels. Some of these girls require more patience than six year olds.

As far as the implants go, they arent' really attractive to me either but I am really happy she didn't choose to spend the money on piercings.

top pose is good, "S" is good might could have been better, showing that tendon at the top of her thigh is good, her left arm might be bent more but all and all its a good image. Thanks for sharing!!!

I too am interested in more shots but not especially of her and not especially without the bikini, just want to see more of your "this type" work.

could you message me your sisters web site?
 
Personally, I do not like these images at all. Every facet of them the model, shot BG arangement/studio setup, and wardrobe has Hustler Magizine and DVD sleeve written all over it. This is likely due to my dislike of Hustler. If the Hustler look was the desired goal (or maybe even the client) they are perfect.

I should prolly also add I am not in any way against "Adult Material" and even make contributions to the world of "Adult Illustrations". I just don't like Hustler, I would sooner buy a censored japanese mag than one of them.
 
Personally, I do not like these images at all. Every facet of them the model, shot BG arangement/studio setup, and wardrobe has Hustler Magizine and DVD sleeve written all over it. This is likely due to my dislike of Hustler. If the Hustler look was the desired goal (or maybe even the client looking for new personelle in the photography dept) they are perfect.

I should prolly also add I am not in any way against "Adult Material" and even make contributions to the world of "Adult Illustrations". I just don't like Hustler, I would sooner buy a censored japanese mag than one of them.
OK, so who exactly gives a rip weather you like the photos or not?
I thought this was a photography discussion board, doesn't that mean comments that have no constructive merit are silly?

Also you are telling the photographer her model looks like a hustler chick, in photos designed to get her a look-see with hustler. [shrug]

Its a lot easier to bash a photo than to take one.
 
OK, so who exactly gives a rip weather you like the photos or not?
I thought this was a photography discussion board, doesn't that mean comments that have no constructive merit are silly?
I am not sure wether or not you noticed it but yes it is delivered in a harsh manner baised on my dislike of something, however this is simply due to the fact that they are a perfect match to that style of photography. If that was the goal it was achieved with perfection. The only thing I could find wrong was that, the fact I did not like them for that reason.

Also you are telling the photographer her model looks like a hustler chick, in photos designed to get her a look-see with hustler. [shrug]

Its a lot easier to bash a photo than to take one.

I may be an arrogant ass, but I am not so arrogant to say I know what the purpose is, was or will be nor am I under any illusion that I could do better because I can't. By this statement you are giving me the impression that you do not believe that a TPM member may be asked to do the photos for a model tryout and/or a TPF member trying out for a photographer position could be a possibility. Am I correct in this assessment?
 
I may be an arrogant ass, but I am not so arrogant to say I know what the purpose is, was or will be nor am I under any illusion that I could do better because I can't. By this statement you are giving me the impression that you do not believe that a TPM member may be asked to do the photos for a model tryout and/or a TPF member trying out for a photographer position could be a possibility. Am I correct in this assessment?

I have no idea what you just said.

If Monte Zucker had said "I just don't like it" that would be OK because he was a master. If I say "I just don't like it" everyone's first question should be "And you are??". Monte would never have only said he didn't like an image, he would always state exactly what, about the photo, he didn't like.

If, as a photographer, you see something that would or might look better done a different way please elaborate. You can't learn from others when they, even those with tremendous skill, don't give any explanation as to how to take the shot differently and what the different way would improve.
 
I have no idea what you just said.

If Monte Zucker had said "I just don't like it" that would be OK because he was a master. If I say "I just don't like it" everyone's first question should be "And you are??". Monte would never have only said he didn't like an image, he would always state exactly what, about the photo, he didn't like.

I did, I stated not only why I did not like them but also made it clear that oppinion is not based on some BS "Oh my it's a half nekid person" ideology.

If, as a photographer, you see something that would or might look better done a different way please elaborate. You can't learn from others when they, even those with tremendous skill, don't give any explanation as to how to take the shot differently and what the different way would improve.

I don't read all the way threw threads pertaining to this type of subject because generally they are full of more than drooling than posts with content, I did however read all of CrazyAva's posts. I do distinctly remember her saying her photos have gotten girls into all three of the primary adult magazines along with some unnamed others.

Now based the quality of the photos I have no input for improvement as I see none to be had, unless they are going to Playboy or Penthouse. These are Hustler quality photographs, contrary to popular belief there are contrasts between the three and their preferred styles.

With out knowing exactly where they are going I will assume they are going to the clientele I am aware of in witch it is most comparable.
 
Every facet of them the model, shot BG arangement/studio setup, and wardrobe has Hustler Magizine and DVD sleeve written all over it.

The pictures I have taken have gotten girls into Hustler magazine and Penthouse and Playboy and various other magazines and online adult sites and also...xxx movies.

Mission Accomplished.
 
Didn't this thread die like 5 months ago????

Hmmm.... Either I missed it, or was just unimpressed.

After reading through the responses, and finding the phrase "nice lighting" at least four times, I gotta ask.... really? Would someone explain why this might be considered "good lighting?"

Thanks!

-Pete
 
Strobe with reflector? or just a strobe?

I can only make out one catch-light in the eye, and I'm guessing it wasn't the on-board flash on the S2 Pro

Nice shots though. the lighting seems pretty even
 
Strobe with reflector? or just a strobe?

I can only make out one catch-light in the eye, and I'm guessing it wasn't the on-board flash on the S2 Pro

Nice shots though. the lighting seems pretty even
Looks like fill-flash to me.
 
Strobe with reflector? or just a strobe?

I can only make out one catch-light in the eye...the lighting seems pretty even

Oh... I can pretty much see WHAT the lighting was. I'm wondering why so many here felt it was "good." Like you say, it's pretty even... so much so that it's nearly flat. It gives me the feel of snapshot photography.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top