Graffiti is an interesting thing. So much of it is ugly, yes, and I feel adds no value to public space. But sometimes the artist is really talented, and but for the fact that it was painted illegally on someone else's property, it would be considered public art. That's certainly a grey area for me. Just look at 5 Pointz:
PHOTOS | 5 POINTZ Of course, that building was just painted over just 6 months ago:
Artists Bid Sad Farewell To 5 Pointz, New York City's Graffiti Mecca
Here's a better picture of the "after." I think it looks a lot uglier without the grafitti:
Graffiti mecca 5 Pointz erased overnight | New York Post
All that said, urban spaces are one thing. Nature is quite another thing. It was annoying to see the things painted on the rocks and ruins of the building. I didn't mind the Arf on the metal fence - the fence itself, after all, was unnatural in that setting.
But no worries, the rest of the walk was graffiti free, and in fact, there was a lot of evidence that nature was reclaiming what is hers:
Waterfall over a broken wall:
Smooth water by
limrodrigues, on Flickr
(Yes, I know the rocks could have been a bit sharper, but that was at 1/2 shutter speed hand-held, bitches :mrgreen: Just braced against my knees.)