Umm Skieur..I disagree entirely.
First of all, your photographic eye comment is entirely off. If anything, not needing to post process an image means you have better photographic eye than someone who NEEDS to post process, since the image is deemed to have been composed well enough to not require it in the first place. Now I'm NOT saying that people who don't PP have a better eye or even insinuating it. What I AM saying is that your comment is entirely off in its meaning.
Now for lack of understanding, I also disagree. I understand the way the digital technology works. I know the ups and downs of how things work, and I am positive Socrates knows them more than me. However, I chose not to post process my images. Sure, on occasion I do it, and sure, I appreciate the results, however, I chose not to post process the vast majority of my work, and I am quite sure that this does not compromise my images.
Now, I am NOT downing post processing in any way. I just do not think that it is something that is required to get the most out of your shots.
Also, I don't wish to start a huge argument and take over Lacey's post, or anything like that, I just want to get my point across.
To the topic:
I agree with everyone saying that she did not mean anything derogatory, and liked your photos. That being said, the way people say things like that CAN get quite irritating. I agree with bhop though, "you're camera takes good pictures" is even worse.