How to create single photo with a look of both side?

[Tight Knot]

Quick photoshop

 

[EchoingWhisper]

Weird chin.

 

[Tight Knot]

Haha. You should see me in real life.
Just following the length of the goatee.

 

[ph0enix]

@buckster Well this photo spread all over on the net facebook,twitter so no big deal.

It's still a violation of the TPF rules.

 

[EchoingWhisper]

I find these types of pictures really odd to look at.

 

[Tight Knot]

I find these types of pictures really odd to look at.

I agree, you need a strange mind to see both faces at the same time, lucky for me, my mind is like my chin - weird.

 

[unpopular]

@buckster Well this photo spread all over on the net facebook,twitter so no big deal.

OK, everyone...... abhj's photos are free for you to use in any fashion, manner and use you see fit. Copyright laws no longer apply because he says so, and it's no big deal.

Where is the superlike button?

 

[unpopular]

I find these types of pictures really odd to look at.

I agree, you need a strange mind to see both faces at the same time, lucky for me, my mind is like my chin - weird.

I like the weird chin. Makes you look so sinister!

Do an evil laugh! DO AN EVIL LAUGH!

 

[Tight Knot]

I find these types of pictures really odd to look at.

I agree, you need a strange mind to see both faces at the same time, lucky for me, my mind is like my chin - weird.

I like the weird chin. Makes you look so sinister!

Do an evil laugh! DO AN EVIL LAUGH!

MWAAAHHHAAAAHAAAAAHA!!!!

 

[GnipGnop]

He never claimed it was his. He claimed he wanted to try and do his own version of it.

Sheesh. Some of you need to relax. I know it goes against "forum rules" but some photographers are fine with reproduction as long as there is no profit being made from it. I'll abide by the forum rules myself, but I disagree with them. Time to get with the times people.

 

[Dao]

He never claimed it was his. He claimed he wanted to try and do his own version of it.

Sheesh. Some of you need to relax. I know it goes against "forum rules" but some photographers are fine with reproduction as long as there is no profit being made from it. I'll abide by the forum rules myself, but I disagree with them. Time to get with the times people.

I think it all comes down to we have a rule in here and most of the members respect that rule.

 

[Tight Knot]

He never claimed it was his. He claimed he wanted to try and do his own version of it.

Sheesh. Some of you need to relax. I know it goes against "forum rules" but some photographers are fine with reproduction as long as there is no profit being made from it. I'll abide by the forum rules myself, but I disagree with them. Time to get with the times people.

If our definitions of right and and wrong can be changed so easily today, we're all in trouble. The fact that he didn't know that it was a forum rule can be forgiven and overlooked. it was the other comments he made after that ticked people off.
I personally didn't say anything, because enough had been said on the subject already by others (and they were correct), I just tried to bring the topic back to what he was trying to achieve.
Excuses don't make for a successful world or life.

 

[KmH]

Time to get with the times people.

100+ Year Old Wisdom | Photo Attorney

Photo Attorney Receives a DMCA Take Down Notice! – Updated | Photo Attorney

Use of Photos by News Reporters Is Not Necessarily Fair Use | Photo Attorney

Google Tries to Freeze Photographer’s DMCA Take Down Notice – Updated | Photo Attorney

Must Read: Copyhype/Terry Hart’s Fair Use Analysis of the “Kind of Bloop” Cover | Photo Attorney

http://www.photoattorney.com/?p=2591

http://www.photoattorney.com/?p=2536

http://www.photoattorney.com/?p=2206

 

[unpopular]

If our definitions of right and and wrong can be changed so easily today, we're all in trouble

^^ There is a trolly barreling down a hill uncontrolled towered a section of track under repair. You know with absolute certainty that if the trolly continued, it would kill everyone aboard. Before you is a switch on the tracks which you know, again with certainty, if activated would save all 15 people (including three children) inside the trolly, but would certainly collide and kill one man crossing the tracks. You know this will kill the man with the same level of certainty as you knew that by doing nothing would kill all the passengers.

Do you pull the switch?

 

[Tight Knot]

If our definitions of right and and wrong can be changed so easily today, we're all in trouble

^^ There is a trolly barreling down a hill uncontrolled towered a section of track under repair. You know with absolute certainty that if the trolly continued, it would kill everyone aboard. Before you is a switch on the tracks which you know, again with certainty, if activated would save all 15 people (including three children) inside the trolly, but would certainly collide and kill one man crossing the tracks. You know this will kill the man with the same level of certainty as you knew that by doing nothing would kill all the passengers.

Do you pull the switch?

Absolutely!!
Without a seconds thought
EDIT: Or, If I was really sinister, I'd step back and pull out my camera and make millions on the photos of the calamity. J/K lol.