What's new

I liked the old brutal TPF better...

Status
Not open for further replies.
The cookie photograph is underexposed and really needs more depth of field. The beer should have more of the pourer's hand in frame but is otherwise OK. The egg has flat lighting, and almost works as a composition but you cut off the hole with the leaves in it, and we need to see the whole thing to balance the egg in the frame. Also, more DoF again, and the light is flat.

In short, you suck, and you need to look in to your TOTAL cost of doing business before you even consider posting anything, you retard. LOL. <-- j/k so it's ok to call you names.

FINE!!!

(packs up and leaves thread dramatically)

img1673a.jpg
 
The cookie photograph is underexposed and really needs more depth of field. The beer should have more of the pourer's hand in frame but is otherwise OK. The egg has flat lighting, and almost works as a composition but you cut off the hole with the leaves in it, and we need to see the whole thing to balance the egg in the frame. Also, more DoF again, and the light is flat.

In short, you suck, and you need to look in to your TOTAL cost of doing business before you even consider posting anything, you retard. LOL. <-- j/k so it's ok to call you names.

FINE!!!

(packs up and leaves thread dramatically)

img1673a.jpg

You know this would be a perfect selective color with the purple hair, just saturate it even more. Oh and then change it to your avator. :lol:
 
LMAO!!! This is the best thread ever... So happy that I complained... hahaha
 
Very insightful critique from Overread above in post #36. C&C on the work of intermediate to advanced photographers' photos is tricky to give...many times the C&C giver gets met with a rash of negative feedback. The last intermediate/advanced photographer's work that I offered less-than-I-love-the-heck-out-of-it type C&C on was met with a $h!+storm of negative pushback in the thread, as well as another thread created by another poster coming to the defense of the original 'offended' poster. So, lesson learned...I try to avoid giving C&C to people who really only want smoke blown up their ____es. Wonderfully-scented, deliriously fragrant, hand-rolled,custom,imported, $1-a-stick Indian incense smoke...

The few really,really caustic attack posters we used to have are...now gone. We also have a mostly new mod crew, with a few of the same old stalwarts, and that seems to have helped. I dunno...TPF has changed...mostly for the better I think. But it is pretty kid-glove in most respects. "it is what it is". It's a mix of all types of people with all types of dedication to the art and craft and science of photography.

Hummmm, interesting viewpoint. At least his, or her, a** will smell nice, and it sounds like you learned something from it. ;)
 
You know this would be a perfect selective color with the purple hair, just saturate it even more. Oh and then change it to your avator. :lol:

Only losers, morons and in-bred mastodons use selective coloring!!!

(was that brutal enough?)
 
Timothy, you said it about as well as it can be said.

Empty praise isn't particularly helpful, but neither are sarcastic or insulting comments instead of straightforward reasons and suggestions in a critique.

I am of the opinion that SOME things need sarcasm and insults .... ;) (and I don't believe in giving EVERY kid a trophy, either.. only those that deserve it!)
 
I just want to be able to call someone a ************ *** dumpster and not have it censored.
 
I just want to be able to call someone a ************ *** dumpster and not have it censored.

Yea.. if it is true, it should not be censored! (and sometimes it is! True, that is! lol!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom