Ballistics
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,781
- Reaction score
- 633
You are clearly not familiar with the case. The car was not moving, she was not even the driver. In fact she was in the back seat. As far as the coffee temperature being decreased, I am unsure about that, but I find that very hard to believe. Being that McDonalds has self-serve coffee I especially have my doubts.
My wife studied this case pretty closely in school, and she had read a lot of the actual court material (which I don't currently have access to). When we hear about these cases we have a certain idea about how the circumstances played out, and that's exactly the problem.
I'm pretty familiar with the case and watched the documentary on it. She was in a Ford Probe as a passenger and her grandson was driving. And you are wrong. She was in the passenger seat. You are right about the car not moving, but that doesn't sway my opinion in the opposite direction.
You're wife studied it closely, and that means what?
You said she received 2nd degree burns. She received 3rd degree burns.
You said she was in the backseat. She was in the passenger seat.
Regardless of how you spin it, this women sued McDonald's for her spilling coffee on herself. Her own negligence. She didn't put her coffee on a table, she put it in between her thighs. She put scolding hot coffee, in between her thighs. She initially sued for Medical and Employment compensation which came to around $20,000. When MCDs declined to pay and offered her $800, she went to an attorney and then sued for negligence.

