If you could only have 3 lenses...

I want:
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 24-70 f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 VR
 
For DX:
Sigma 10-20, I can't stand how plastic the Nikon 12-24 is, and the 10-20 is wider.

Nikon 17-55 f/2.8

Nikon's 70-200VR


For FX:

Sigma 12-24, because when I want to go wider then 24mm, it's because I want things to look jacked.

24-70 f/2.8 (because limited to 3, i chose this instead of primes in the range)

Nikon's 80-200 AF-D, because yes it really is that much better on full frame, not to mention is ergonomically superior to the 70-200VR.
 
Nope, here I was right. The Nikon 80-200 F2.8 AF-S is a great lens, and I'd love to have one.

Hmm, interesting lens - didn't see that one yet. Is Nikon still making this? How much can it be found for used? I really don't like that they're removing the aperture rings from the newer lenses, and a 80-200mm AF-S sounds interesting.

If I would be getting three additional lenses, I'd get the following:

  • Nikkor AF 80-200mm f2.8
  • Nikkor AF 35mm f2
  • Nikkor AF 85mm f1.4
If it would be ONLY three lenses to have, I'd get the following:

  • Nikkor AF-S 105mm f2.8 Micro
  • Nikkor AF 80-200mm f2.8
  • Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm f2.8
However, if I'd have more choices, I'd prefer only primes, except for the long end (80-200mm).
 
Samriel said:
Hmm, interesting lens - didn't see that one yet. Is Nikon still making this? How much can it be found for used? I really don't like that they're removing the aperture rings from the newer lenses, and a 80-200mm AF-S sounds interesting.

Nikon no longer produces the 80-200mm AF-S lens. It was replaced by the 70-200mm AF-S VR lens. They do still make an 80-200mm AF-D lens. You might be able to find the AF-S version on ebay. A quick check reveals quite a few. I actually just watched one sell for $605 USD.
 
For DX:
Sigma 10-20, I can't stand how plastic the Nikon 12-24 is, and the 10-20 is wider.

Nikon 17-55 f/2.8

Nikon's 70-200VR


For FX:

Sigma 12-24, because when I want to go wider then 24mm, it's because I want things to look jacked.

24-70 f/2.8 (because limited to 3, i chose this instead of primes in the range)

Nikon's 80-200 AF-D, because yes it really is that much better on full frame, not to mention is ergonomically superior to the 70-200VR.
I dont think that you would be able to use that full range of FX or the Sigma 12-24
 
Hmm... hard call. It would probably be what is currently in my bag.

Voigtlander 12mm Heliar
Leica 35mm Summarit
Leica 75mm Summarit

Easy to focus, easy to pack, loads of fun.
 
I use DX bodies

My best 3 primes:
Nikkor 20mm f2.8 AFD
Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AFD
Nikkor 85mm f1.4 AFD

My 3 best zooms:
Nikkor 17-55 f2.8 AFS
Nikkor 35-70 f2.8 AFD
Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 AFS

It's all good:D
 
I dont think that you would be able to use that full range of FX or the Sigma 12-24

Yes you can, it's a DG lens, not a DC lens, we have one in our storeon display, and have used on a D700, it's WILD.


Look up reviews for it, it's designed for film.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top