Acting as though a good photographer isn't restricted by technology barriers is childish. If technology doesn't matter, then why buy expensive cameras? Getting a good camera doesn't make you a good photographer, it allows you to take good pictures.
To OP: What are you taking pictures of? We can't tell you that the camera is good for what you want to take pictures of because we're not psychics. I'm sorry but these posts come in every single day and there's nothing more annoying than the "should i buy this?" threads.
But without knowing what you're actually interested in here's a quick breakdown of the camera:
It's a P&S, it's actually a Bridge but as it has no proper viewfinder and has a crappy [small] sensor I'll call it a P&S.
Fixed Lens: It's a low quality [because of all the optics required for the zoom range], slow zoom lens with a fairly decent range. It's fixed meaning if you want a much sharper, faster lens you're going to have to shell out much, much more money for a entirely new camera and an entirely new lens, which is probably going to be more expensive then the camera body itself if you're looking for fast and sharp.
It's only something you buy if you really intend to actually use the ridiculous 38-380mm zoom range on the camera, for maybe wildlife or some other purpose that would actually require such a hefty zoom range. Otherwise if you want to use it for anything else you might find it's a bit too slow and possibly not very sharp given the amount of optics in the lens required to give it the large zoom range.
I am only commenting on the lens itself because I don't care about the camera body, the body is a bridge so it should have all the manual controls you'll need, however the lens is what truly makes you able to take the pictures you need. And if that lens doesn't fit your needs or purposes, then you're throwing the entire camera out.