What's new

Is this HDR?

THIS IS A BANNED TOPIC!!!!!! YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DISCUSS WHAT IS AND IS NOT HDR!!!!!!!

Run. Before big brother catches up.

----

For what it's worth, if it's not a composite - it's not HDR. The photographer may have used strobed to balance the subject with the background.

Look at me. I'm such a rebel!
 
THIS IS A BANNED TOPIC!!!!!! YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DISCUSS WHAT IS AND IS NOT HDR!!!!!!!

Run. Before big brother catches up.

----

For what it's worth, if it's not a composite - it's not HDR. The photographer may have used strobed to balance the subject with the background.

Look at me. I'm such a rebel!

I was under the impression that the banned aspect was more along the lines of creationist vs naturalist, not "was HDR used to render this photograph" :)

I would bet money that is a composite shot. It might even be a digital "painting". Whatever it is, I can't imagine it being anywhere near "SOOC" lol
 
The kids are definitely lit by a different source than the sun. Judging by the vegetation, I'm willing to guess that it is at least tonemapped. I see why you'd be asking. But there is certainly two different things going on here. I'm not even 100% sure that the kids were all taken with the same lens, or if they were, they were taken with the same lens as the background... not 100% sure on that one though.
 
That looks more like a collage of assembled photos. The lighting is off and the shadows dont look right. The spray is fake. Its not a bad job, and its not an HDR.
 
Just by looking at all his other work I would have to agree with said comments. It is probably a combination of real images, HDR backgrounds, Photoshop paintings/digital effects and composited together.

Thanks for sharing this guy has some skillzzzzzz
 
He's got some BEAUTIFUL stuff in his image stream!!!
 
this guy is good his work is very similar to David Hill....

i can tell he def uses topaz
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom