O hey tyler - I take your comments with a grain of salt now. It seems as though your just a person with a lot of negative energy in your life. The majority of your post are just nitpicking everything with not much positive things to say. CC is not just whats the bad part but also what is the good part. When you post you come across as an arrogant person and nothing I have read has changed my mind.
So, you're saying I was disrespectful to you in this thread? Because I gave you negative C&C?
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/hdr-discussions/265267-bike-porch-hdr.html#post2415717
Proof that you can't take C&C. I wasn't rude, I wasn't bashing your work. I was giving quick, clear and concise pointers on how to improve your photograph. No disrespect intended.
I don't think I have even seen one your photos to get an idea what you bring to the table (prove me wrong)!
You haven't looked very hard.
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/general-gallery/265565-your-best-photo-2011-a-2.html#post2419868
I'm not trying to make this a pissing contest. I'm not trying to assert that I am better than you. I am trying to get you to understand that you are not very good at accepting critique. I have nothing to prove to you. I've had more photographic experience than you. That's not the point. I'm trying to HELP you by giving you pointers.
On the note of CC if a person just says don't like it or negative comments without offering some useful tips on how to make an image better than yeah what is there to say and respond?
That's EXACTLY WHAT I DID. I gave you pointers on how to IMPROVE YOUR BIKE PHOTO. Just as Bynx gave you on how to improve the shots in this thread. Granted, the only photo with oddly colored median lines is #2. The median lines seem to be pretty accurate in the other photos.
I am not choosing a cop out that I live in a boring place those are your words not mine. I said I will have to work to find better areas to work with....meaning I will not settle for my geographic location but look for places to shoot. How do you see that as a cop out?
You said "One thing holding be back is really there is not much going on here in Tucson where I live." Learning to see creatively will open more opportunities for you to shoot in your current location.
You think you live in a boring area? I've been to Tuscon. It's beautiful. It's a city of 500,000 people, and has breathtaking landscapes a stones throw away. I live in MAINE. In a town with roughly 20,000 people. You live in a much more industrious, diverse, and visually interesting place than a lot of people. In a city with 480,000 people more than mine. Granted, Maine is beautiful, and I love shooting here. I can see creatively. I don't make excuses about it.
As far as portraits I don't care to post to much here because I am apart of another forum that people give great CC and help you out achieve better results, therefore I do my posting there with portraits as they are not fans of HDR at all.
This isn't specifically an HDR photoforum. The HDR section is a subsection. You can post portraiture for C&C in the
Photography Beginners' Forum & Photo Gallery . Perhaps you'll see a different side to portraiture other than what DeviantArt says.
With Bynx, hey he came across rather rude, his first post was not CC it was just a few rude statements of his opinion. Kinda like your posts. He may not ask to have his flickr account be critiqued but I will do my homework and see that someone brings to the table before I I challenge them.
Neither Bynx, nor I have made 'rude' posts towards you. This is additional proof that you cannot accept critique. I know for a fact that other forum members would agree with me on this one. Why don't you get off your horse and stop judging people? You think that you have the photographic knowledge of composition, lighting, and exposure. But you've done nothing to demonstrate that type of photographic knowledge. I am not trying to be rude, but you've basically JUST joined the forum and are under the impression that others work has to be 'up to your standards' to accept critique from them. That's asinine, especially for a newb to the forum.
The way critique works is that you absorb what people say. Some people may have better ideas than others. You go out and experiment and see what sticks. Not say "Oh I like it the way it is." There's no point in posting for critique if you just disregard it.
I remembered that toranto house and thinking this does not that great so I thought i would look more in depth and what I found was good and bad stuff in my opinions but the point is if someone is going to say stuff like that they better have a portfolio to
back it up. How things changed though " a point and shoot" as an excuse.
I can't say I follow the broken sentence structure in this part.
Here are a few portraits just for the sake of posting them so you can not use an excuse to hit me on this..
Thank you for posting some of your other work. I'm not going to critique them because you didn't ask for them to be critiqued and portraiture isn't what the thread is about. I see some things that could be improved, but I will refrain from interjecting.
Sorry but I am not a push over and will stand my ground! At least I post pictures trying to get better at this rather than just talk crap about everybody's pictures.
It's great that you're not a pushover. To take a photograph with intent, and then be able to back up your artistic decisions is admirable. And if by "talking crap" you mean giving constructive criticism, then yes, at least you do post a lot of photos.
Once again lets see your stuff and make me shut up and gain respect for you.
As I stated previously. I've got nothing to prove to you. You can look at my photos in the other thread. Here's a quick shot that I threw together using strobed light the other day. Have you had any experience with flash photography? Other than on camera pop-up flash? I'll even explain how I lit it and why I lit it that way.
I used a Canon 5D1 with an 85mm f/1.4 lens mounted on it at f/8, 1/200s @ ISO 200. I used f/8 because it gave me an appropriate amount of sharpness throughout the camera body, while slightly defocusing the lens statistics of the 50mm f/1.4 mounted on the camera. I initially exposed at ISO 100, but the image was slightly underexposed, so I used ISO 200 instead of changing the power of my speedlights. With a full frame camera, and even some of the new cameras coming out have very low noise up to ISO 800. So using ISO 200 for this shot did not noticeably harm image quality.
I had two 430EX II's setup, one shooting through a parabolic umbrella at 1/2 power approximately 4 feet camera right, and a bare 430EX II camera left at 1/16th power reflecting off the wall to get the proper angular light to give the grip texture. They were both fired by Cactus V4's.
Here is another shot I did with strobed light of my girlfriend and I on our 2 year anniversary.
I used one 430EX II on a light stand, bare. I put the 430 with a plastic bag over it to prevent it from getting wet. Set the camera up on a tripod, same setup as before, 5D, 85mm. I shot this on ISO100, 1/200s @ f/3.5 to get adequate DoF. The flash was on low power behind us to freeze the rain and provide light bloom around our silhouettes.
It's true. I am defending Bynx. Someone who long ago I got into a forum quarrel with. I've moved on, and I think he has too. I will not let someone, even if I've been in an argument, be told that their C&C is disrespectful when it clearly isn't.
I am totally open to providing respectful C&C on peoples work, but I will not stand for someone saying that my C&C was "all negative, with no pointers or tips", when that is clearly not the case. You yourself have to be open to critique prior to even posting an image. I apologize for the lengthy post, and the tough love, but you've got to be open to new ideas if you're going to really grow from C&C.
Capish?