What's new

Lance never did have the cance

rexbobcat

Been spending a lot of time on here!
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
5,014
Reaction score
1,968
Location
United States
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
So apparently between the unraveling of Lance's long-assumed drug use, he never had cancer either.

Damn. I can forgive the guy for using the steroids because it's not uncommon at all in his sport (not that it's ethical...it's just common), but lying about cancer has really turned me off to supporting Lance probably forever.

Who the hell does that? :/

Lance Armstrong, Manti Te'o, and Truth About Cancer : The New Yorker
 
I don't think he's suggesting Armstrong didn't have cancer, just that he had a little more help afterwards to accomplish what he did, beyond just 'motivation'. Given that the intended use of EPO is to help improve quality of life for people undergoing chemo, I assumed that was how he originally got into using it.
 
WTF are you talking about? Of course he had cancer. He just used drugs to enhance his performance on the bike.
 
If true, very sad that we are lied to so much.
 
The Daily Currant is a satire news site, like (but not as good as, IMHO) The Onion.
 
2WheelPhoto said:
do you trust this source? i don't find that story with other news sources?

I'm not really sure how accurate that source is. But I keep Finding snippets about how his cancer wasn't exactly as destructive as he made it out to be.

Oprah is supposed to be interviewing him about all of this stuff tonight.

The damn lies of Lance Armstrong - SFGate

well, that should set everything straight then...Oprah is a shining beacon of honest and non biased broadcast journalism :lmao:
 
personally i was a little disheartened by armstrongs admitting to blood doping. being a huge tour de france fan, i really looked at it as one of the last bastians of legitimate athletics.
 
pixmedic said:
well, that should set everything straight then...Oprah is a shining beacon of honest and non biased broadcast journalism :lmao:

Lol. I guess it depends on what questions she asks. Probably won't be very scathing but...maybe?
 
pixmedic said:
well, that should set everything straight then...Oprah is a shining beacon of honest and non biased broadcast journalism :lmao:

Lol. I guess it depends on what questions she asks. Probably won't be very scathing but...maybe?

i suppose it could be.. maybe lance is going to get on and expose just how widespread the doping was in the Tour. he denied it for so long, maybe hes just going to start "outing" everyone now.
 
i don't like oprah nor lance
bigthumb.gif
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom