I'm still trying to figure out if a bar is legally considered private or public... but if you're not selling them... there shouldn't be a problem.
If you're really paranoid about it though, just ask the owner or manager of the club. :sillysmi:
A bar is private property and the owner can prohibit photography if they choose to, but as long as the bar is open for business, the people in it are in public, and cannot have a reasonable expectation of pivacy.
That's so confusing!
So as long as the bar's owner doesn't prohibit photography, I can take as many pictures as I want and do whatever I want with them as long as I'm not selling them commercially for ads or what have you?
You can sell them to whoever you want and you don't need permission from any of the people in the photos, as long as you sell them in small quantities. There is a point where selling a popular photo become distribution, which will kick-in the need for model release.
Where it gets sticky is when someone (or a business, like the bar owner for instance) buys one of those photos and wants to use it in an advertisement. At that point the entity that bought the image from you, would need the permission of any people in the photo for that use.
Advertising agencies know they need model releases, and usually expect the photographer to get releases signed at the time they make the photo(s). The local bar owner may not know that.
The key is
how an image will be used and the circumstances under which the image was made.
Another key concept is that a model release protects two entities:
- the model and or recognizable people in an image.
- the publisher of that image.
The photographer is usually
NOT the publisher of the image.
Model release law is not real cut and dried. It varies from state to state. States that have big entertainment and publishing industries, like New York and California, have much more complex model release statutes than states that don't.
So, you have to find out what is what wherever it is you are making the images.