Legs, anyone?

[TheMightyGoat]

The wall is cluttered. It was intentional, but I'm not sure whether it works.

 

[Weaving Wax]

To me, the wall is distracting and takes away from the legs.

 

[NavyChief]

The wall can be a bit distracting, but to me, the whole body would have been much sexier / sultry. Not sure if thats what you were going for, but a set of legs, is well, just a set of legs.

Chief

 

[GeneralBenson]

The distortion and lack of being connected to a body takes away any appeal that those legs would have had.

 

[musicaleCA]

The model's left leg is cut at the ankle. That's the most glaring issue I see.

 

[Baaaark]

Okay, so I'm gonna be honest, so don't burn me for this. The clipping of her foot on the left side, and her toes on the other is kinda distracting.

But the part that bothers me is different. I see a woman in fishnets. I think this is very sexy, so I'm thinking about sex. Then I see the background with the torn up walls and cheap posters (even though they are cool), and it makes me think of something cheap. I guess what I'm trying to say is with the awesome lady in the photo with this as a background, kinda cheapens her and even possibly makes the photo (not her) look kinda trampy.

I hate even to say it, cause I don't want to hurt your feelings. And its definitely not the model or the outfit's fault. Just two different themes in the photo that are clashing instead of melting together.

 

[Josh220]

Who goes with those legs?