What's new

Macro lens attachment, kit lens or telephoto?

Jack2013

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
Location
United Kingdom
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
Hi Guys,

I invested in one of those macro attachments that screws onto your lens and allows macro shots inexpensively, my question is; is it better to attach this to a telephoto lens (55-200mm) or my kit lens (18-55)?

The reason I ask is people mention that because of the high magnification of telephoto lenses, they are ideal for macro by not disturbing the subject, however I wonder if it makes much of a difference on how magnified the subject could be?

Cheers

Jack
 
I hate to break the news to you...but P T Barnum was right...A sucker is born every minute! Since you already bought the screw-on macro lens, it was your minute! I had my minute, too, when I did the same thing!

Not long after stepping up from a point and shoot to a DSLR (used 30D + 18-135 and 55-250), I figured I'd try a macro and tele 'set' of screw on lenses I found on ebay. Hey, together, they were about $45...so if they were junk, it wasn't the end of the world.

Turns out they were. I first screwed the 'tele' converted on the end of my 18-135 lens. No matter what I tried, the lens couldn't achieve focus on anything! It kept hunting and hunting. So I switched to manual focus and tried a couple of shots indoors and outdoors. When I looked at the results on my computer, I know the lens was worthless. Now the real surprise. While unscrewing it from the front of my 18-135, the teleconverter itself unscrewed into two pieces and the pair of lenses and spacer rings inside fell to the floor. Both the tele and macro 'converters' went immediately to the trash. Lesson learned the hard way. At least it wasn't as expensive of a lesson as some I've had.

Perhaps the best way to try out macro photography without any great expense is to purchase one or more macro extension tubes of varying lengths. They mount to the back end of your lens(es) and thence to the camera. They are merely hollow tubes that (optionally) provide the appropriate contact connections between the lens and the camera. By physically moving the lens further away from the camera sensor, the image coming out of the rear of the lens is 'expanded' when it hits the sensor. Multiple extension tubes can be mounted for even more 'expansion', although 2 is a practical maximum due to structural considerations.

Not being particularly interested in macro photography, I did do a couple of shots with my 18-135 lens zoomed in from about 4-5 feet away from the subject (a flower), just to see what it could do. It was good enough for me. But if I wanted to do macro photography with limited expenditure, macro tubes are the way to go.

If you think you'd really like to do close up photography of coins, stamps, jewelry, insects, etc, the best option is a lens specifically designed to as a macro lens. I know Canon makes a 60mm macro lens and 100mm macro lens, perhaps others, too. The only 'trick' to using them is to realize that the depth of field from really close distances (6-12", typically) is perhaps 1/2" 'thick'. So the eyes of a bumble bee may be in perfect focus, but its back end will not be perfectly sharp.
 
Hi Brat,

it's interesting you mention this as I've found it more than adequate!

I've attached a photo of a flower I took in my backyard, this was with my kit lens, macro attachment lens (opteka 52mm 10x can be found on amazon) and Nikon D5100.

I thought it was pretty good..

$_DSC0174.webp$_DSC0176.webp
 
When I bought my 50mm 1.8 used it came with a set of "digital" brand screwon magnification/macro lens.
Though not true macro, it's basically magnification.

They worked pretty good actually as I was able to get right up to the subject.
Unfortunately, by getting right up to the subject with interior lighting I also blocked the lighting.
Also upon closer inspection and learning more and more, I find some of the details are somewhat lost.
But it still took nice closeup shots and were fairly detailed.

For the price I think maybe another $5 to the eBay bought 50mm it was a good purchase for what it was.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom