- Joined
- Dec 11, 2006
- Messages
- 18,743
- Reaction score
- 8,049
- Location
- Mid-Atlantic US
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Banned
- #16
I don't see why this photo, or any for that matter needs any of that for a photo to have "substance".
As if there is some sort of set formula or recipe.
It's an old man in a park lost in thought. He's looking into open space, interesting enough for me,
but maybe your standards are higher?
The fact that he's alone, looking at nothing, made me take this photo. He stayed like this for a few minutes before he fell asleep lol.
I like pictures that are anchored to something rather than just being.
This is sharp, it is well converted but anonymous and, imo, without any feeling of its own.
You say that he's alone, could be, but from everything we see he might be watching his dog play with his nephew or waiting for his wife who is late.
There is no emotion except as the viewer cares to impute to it.
So you're saying you don't enjoy ambiguity in a photo then?
not at all.
ambiguity implies there is some question, something to be ambiguous about.
except for the technical considerations, this picture is not 'about' anything.
we could say virtually anything about the subject that is consonant with him sitting where he is and there would be no evidence one way or the other, no hints from anything we can see.
He is happy, unhappy, sad, thoughtful, bored, sleepy, asleep with his eyes open.
That's the failing.