OK. That may explain very narrow dynamic range or not, if the prints are made this way. Hard to say. It might be also, cause your negative is underexposed or under developed. There are large areas of blackness devoid of any detail. You may like it that way, but in landscape it doesn't really work.Scans from prints![]()
But the picture of cars came out very good so scanner is not that guilty. Listen, if you don't want to continue this discussion that's fine. Judging from your pictures you are relatively new to film photography, and discussing things is a way to get better. This forum or some others, there are always people with a life long experience, why not to take advantage of that. You may want to check out Strona g .I said, that I haven't got good scanner so sorry for the low quality![]()
I don't you are saying nothing. So, how long are you shooting film ?Timor, you don't understand me
Again you are avoiding a straight answer. I think it is important, in film photography there is no computerized aid, personal experience in every small detail is everything, one gains experience with the time and amount of used film and paper.Is it important? I think - no.