danieldthomas
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello first poster here!
I purchased my first camera ( a Fuji XT-1) as well as the 18-55mm, 35mm and 14mm before a 6 month backpacking trip last year and it is still my current setup. I also have an x100s which I absolutely love.
Being my first kit and the first time dabbling in photography I loved it and am hooked on photography and travel now. In a few weeks I am about to embark on another trip, 4-5 months living in Shanghai studying and then 3-5 months travelling through Central and South America, mainly Cuba, Guatemala and most importantly Patagonia and Peru.
This time around I am looking at taking this much more seriously and trying to get some paid work through my photography and writing hence I am looking to change kit. For this trip I will be doing a lot of the following:
- Night photography and night landscapes in Shanghai
- Outdoor/Adventure photography in Patagonia and Peru
- Astrophotography in Patagonia
- Filming
- Prints
The XT-1 is a great camera but I just feel like it if I am looking to go professional and get some paid work it won't be the workhorse I need it to be for the above tasks. It's low light performance isn't great, the filming capabilities are terrible and its hard to get big prints out of the smaller sensor. Therefore I am looking at moving over to Canon, namely the 5D series and am tossing up between the Mark ii and Mark iii.
At this point in time I can get a secondhand Mark ii with a low shutter count for a tad more than a $1000 AUD less than a secondhand Mark iii. Budget is a big issue here as I need the money to travel. I figured I could buy the Mark ii and invest the saved money in better glass and if I manage to get paid for some work, upgrade to the Mark iii in 4 or so months time. My question is, is there a huge performance gap between the Mark ii and Mark iii when being used for the previously mentioned work? Also am I being silly about switching kits? Also If I did move to Canon I would sell my XT-1 kit and use that money but keep the X100s as it is an excellent little camera for street work, something I love doing. Therefore I'd probably just need a landscape lens and general travel lens for the Canon. Any suggestions?
*** Also the size and weight difference between the two systems honestly doesn't bother me too much and shouldn't be a big deciding factor. If it's going to get the work done I will take the extra weight!
Sorry for the lengthy post! I appreciate any advice or feedback! Thanks in advance!
I purchased my first camera ( a Fuji XT-1) as well as the 18-55mm, 35mm and 14mm before a 6 month backpacking trip last year and it is still my current setup. I also have an x100s which I absolutely love.
Being my first kit and the first time dabbling in photography I loved it and am hooked on photography and travel now. In a few weeks I am about to embark on another trip, 4-5 months living in Shanghai studying and then 3-5 months travelling through Central and South America, mainly Cuba, Guatemala and most importantly Patagonia and Peru.
This time around I am looking at taking this much more seriously and trying to get some paid work through my photography and writing hence I am looking to change kit. For this trip I will be doing a lot of the following:
- Night photography and night landscapes in Shanghai
- Outdoor/Adventure photography in Patagonia and Peru
- Astrophotography in Patagonia
- Filming
- Prints
The XT-1 is a great camera but I just feel like it if I am looking to go professional and get some paid work it won't be the workhorse I need it to be for the above tasks. It's low light performance isn't great, the filming capabilities are terrible and its hard to get big prints out of the smaller sensor. Therefore I am looking at moving over to Canon, namely the 5D series and am tossing up between the Mark ii and Mark iii.
At this point in time I can get a secondhand Mark ii with a low shutter count for a tad more than a $1000 AUD less than a secondhand Mark iii. Budget is a big issue here as I need the money to travel. I figured I could buy the Mark ii and invest the saved money in better glass and if I manage to get paid for some work, upgrade to the Mark iii in 4 or so months time. My question is, is there a huge performance gap between the Mark ii and Mark iii when being used for the previously mentioned work? Also am I being silly about switching kits? Also If I did move to Canon I would sell my XT-1 kit and use that money but keep the X100s as it is an excellent little camera for street work, something I love doing. Therefore I'd probably just need a landscape lens and general travel lens for the Canon. Any suggestions?
*** Also the size and weight difference between the two systems honestly doesn't bother me too much and shouldn't be a big deciding factor. If it's going to get the work done I will take the extra weight!
Sorry for the lengthy post! I appreciate any advice or feedback! Thanks in advance!