Mel said:
Wow good for you! that is awesome. those 2 camera sure a big difference in price. So you don't think that my N65 would be good? Not new enough or not enough options? I'm really new at this so if you have patience I would appreciate it. I bought myself a few photography books. Lighting, basics, etc. Is there anything you can help me with... We could talk on email to... or IM.
Actually one body is pretty much the same as another. We rarely push the upper shutter speeds during a normal wedding shot on 50 or 100 ISO film, so it's irrelevant. However, bigger "pro" bodies like the F100 and the F5 and the F6 look better and handle better. They have grips and motor drives which can push the shots out faster. They're not plastic, so they don't break easily.
As Bob quite rightly says, you get what you pay for. If people are paying $3000 for you to do their wedding, then they expect the world's best kit and similar results. However, if you're doing family portraits for the people at church, then use what makes you comfortable.
I've owned an F65 (as it's called here) and it doesn't compare to any of the metal cameras I have listed. However, photographically it is no different. It will not take significantly worse pictures. The metering and AF aren't very good on it - it's slow, but these aren't vital points.
What do you want to do? Leap into commercial photography? Start slow with friends and family? Do studio portraits? Weddings? These are the questions which you need the answers to before you can even think about buying kit.
So, lets start at the beginning... if you want to get into paid photography, you've got to be appropriately equipped. However, equipped for every situation is going to cost say $20,000+ and you wouldn't have a clue how to use it!
If you're looking to get some casual cash from photography, then you won't go far wrong with the F100 or F5. It's a very versatile tool and at the top of the SLR market. If you've already got some Nikon lenses, then they'll work on them as well (bonus!).
Rob