iLLucionist
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2016
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 1
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Spending money on lenses can be from small money to remortgage the house money. Most say it's better to put the money on lenses over the camera body, personally I think its a bit of both.
The tamron 70-300mm usd vc is a fine lens. If you intend on shooting in good light it probably is a better option than a 70-200 f2.8 for the fact that it has a better range and is lighter and of course cheaper. When light levels drop the 70-200 f2.8 come into their own because they let more light in and will have more confident focus.
You asked also about macro. I suggest you look at the sigma 105mm f2.8 OS or the tamron 90mm f2.8 vc. Both are fine macros, with a focal length that means you are not on top of your subject when you are shooting, making it better for scared little bugs and for not casting a shadow on your subject. I am not sure how relevant this is for you using a lightbox, but there probably isn't any relevant reason to spend double on a nikon brand here.
lightroom is great, but even in jpeg, your camera will have settings that allow the high saturation look straight out of camera
I read that the tamron 70-300mm usd vc is not that good for moving sport photography? Do I have other options? It needs to be water proof / resistant btw. I hope you don't mind asking.. this is really new territory for me.
Macro sounds good, I'll check out those lenses.
I wasn't aware that these cameras have so many options to tweak photos. I'm already curious to try one out.