gossamer
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2013
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 23
- Location
- New Jersey
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hi all,
I'm relatively new to photography, although not a complete newbie. I'm not sure I understand how all the lenses work, and how they relate to each other, however.
I have a 16-85mm 3.5-5.6 and a 70-300mm lens already. I'm looking for a nice Nikkor lens suitable for portraits, although something that can also be used for macro photography would be nice. Does such a lens exist?
It looks like the 55mm lens is what I'm looking for, but my 16-85mm encompasses that range already. Would it make sense to have a separate 55mm in that case? Of course I'd like to be able to create that bokeh depth-of-field effect.
I've been considering the Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G lens for this purpose. I understand depth-of-field is a characteristic of aperture, but how does the 2.8 relate to being suitable for macro photography?
Thanks,
Dave
I'm relatively new to photography, although not a complete newbie. I'm not sure I understand how all the lenses work, and how they relate to each other, however.
I have a 16-85mm 3.5-5.6 and a 70-300mm lens already. I'm looking for a nice Nikkor lens suitable for portraits, although something that can also be used for macro photography would be nice. Does such a lens exist?
It looks like the 55mm lens is what I'm looking for, but my 16-85mm encompasses that range already. Would it make sense to have a separate 55mm in that case? Of course I'd like to be able to create that bokeh depth-of-field effect.
I've been considering the Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G lens for this purpose. I understand depth-of-field is a characteristic of aperture, but how does the 2.8 relate to being suitable for macro photography?
Thanks,
Dave