birket
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Oxford
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Asked a thousand times, but here we go again:
I've been a keen photographer for a long time, coming from 35mm film years ago with Canon SLRs, through to digital compacts and dSLRs and also mirrorless interchangeable cameras (the last one just rolls off the tongue doesn't it??). I have found that my Sigma cameras (a DP1 and an SD10 - and for a time, the SD15) have given me the best shots. These cameras tended to slow me down and consider my shots more. Looking back at my old 35mm slide photos, most, if not all shots were - IMO - good shots...keepers. More recently, with digital cameras being so instant, I have taken so many shots that I rarely even look at them any more.
I have a mind to get a medium format camera. Slow down my photography taking and get back to the fundamentals. 12 shots per roll sounds very attractive to me. I can take the camera on a day trip and shoot a roll specific to that trip. I will not give up on digital. Digital will always be my main method. But at times where I want to do something a bit different - a bit special - I will try my hand with MF.
So, which direction to go?
I started looking at TLR cameras, thinking it a relatively inexpensive entry into MF. Then I started researching and found that the Rolleiflex TLR f2.8 cameras were some of the better ones. They are quite expensive though, and good ones do not come up very often. I then 'discovered' the Hasselblad 500CM. Wow! I want that camera. I love the back-to-basics, clunkiness of it. Problem is, even more expensive! This is so common with me. I end up spending far more on something than I should. I guess that if I did plunge for the Hassy 500 it will hold its value so I can re-sell it if I find MF not for me, or if I find it is just a fad.
Is this a common dilemma? Guidance would be appreciated.
I've been a keen photographer for a long time, coming from 35mm film years ago with Canon SLRs, through to digital compacts and dSLRs and also mirrorless interchangeable cameras (the last one just rolls off the tongue doesn't it??). I have found that my Sigma cameras (a DP1 and an SD10 - and for a time, the SD15) have given me the best shots. These cameras tended to slow me down and consider my shots more. Looking back at my old 35mm slide photos, most, if not all shots were - IMO - good shots...keepers. More recently, with digital cameras being so instant, I have taken so many shots that I rarely even look at them any more.
I have a mind to get a medium format camera. Slow down my photography taking and get back to the fundamentals. 12 shots per roll sounds very attractive to me. I can take the camera on a day trip and shoot a roll specific to that trip. I will not give up on digital. Digital will always be my main method. But at times where I want to do something a bit different - a bit special - I will try my hand with MF.
So, which direction to go?
I started looking at TLR cameras, thinking it a relatively inexpensive entry into MF. Then I started researching and found that the Rolleiflex TLR f2.8 cameras were some of the better ones. They are quite expensive though, and good ones do not come up very often. I then 'discovered' the Hasselblad 500CM. Wow! I want that camera. I love the back-to-basics, clunkiness of it. Problem is, even more expensive! This is so common with me. I end up spending far more on something than I should. I guess that if I did plunge for the Hassy 500 it will hold its value so I can re-sell it if I find MF not for me, or if I find it is just a fad.
Is this a common dilemma? Guidance would be appreciated.