NEX 7 at 3200iso

[Crollo]

Where in DXoMark's test that shows 60D and NEX-7 having similar SNR?

36DB at ISO 100. Go to DxOMark.com and put NEX 7 and 60D on comparison on SNR 18% with 'screen' selected. Fair enough?

Post the link on here

Do I have to do that for you? Im not a babysitter.lol. You know there is Google search, Yahoo, etc., right? Nyehehehe!!!

 

[argieramos]

36DB at ISO 100. Go to DxOMark.com and put NEX 7 and 60D on comparison on SNR 18% with 'screen' selected. Fair enough?

Post the link on here

Do I have to do that for you? Im not a babysitter.lol. You know there is Google search, Yahoo, etc., right? Nyehehehe!!!

So you are EchoingWhisper now? You wish Nyehehehehe!!!

 

[argieramos]

What did I say that made you think that I am a troll? You are just saying that because you can't accept the truth that Canon cameras IQ is really inferior to the camera that you Canon trolls are bashing. Sorry bro, that's life

NEX 3 vs 7D – Who will win ? | Resensor - Alex Sierra's Lens and Camera Review

You're trashing a camera brand. That makes you a troll.

Hmmm. Let's see....
Belial (you): "It's not the number of lenses it's the fact that Sony has many missing areas. Also their lenses are ridiculously priced an there's just no good models".
"Yet most other sites disagree. Let's face it. Slt is a crap tech that'll never go anywhere"

Tyler: "Of course you're not dumb as a box of rocks. If you were, you'd own an A77"

Derrel: "I think I'm going to have some vinyl bumper stickers made up, "Sony A77 versus A Real Camera", and sell them for $6 a pop!"

If you think I'm a troll, okay whatever. . But there are more bigger trolls in here, and you're one of them lol

 

[argieramos]

If you think Sony's way of doing LV is the same way as Canon and Nikon do theirs, you don't know what you are talking about. Sony is doing a double sensor approach for the LV. It is better and faster.

I wasn't talking about Sony specifically, just the use of live view in general on any make.

That's okay, he's only ever known/lived/breathed Sony and has no knowledge of other manufacturers. You should expect this.

Look who's talking. I have a NIkon D3100. You can ask me about it
I have a knowledge about Canon. Their best APS-C semi-Pro level is inferior to the Sony's worst mirrorless, the Nex-3 in terms of Image Quality.
Here, take a look at this again.
http://www.resensor.com/2011/07/nex-3-vs-7d-who-will-win/
You see what I mean? Why are you bashing a Sony camera if the Canon's best APS-C couldn't even beat the NEX-3. lol

 

[argieramos]

Look, quit being an ass. I took those photos as examples of the high ISO of the 60D. And earlier you said that technology makes the photographer. Or atleast that's what I inferred from your mockery.

And you didn't take any of those photos. I'm almost certain of it. Or atleast, I haven't seen anything spectacular out of you. That's all I'm saying, bro.

PS: The A100 or whatever the fck the first Sony DSLR was had an AF that was set up horribly. It's not my fault if it's taken Sony like 6-7 years to develop useable SLR technology that has been around for decades. I think I'll stick with Sony for my gaming needs, and leave the photography equipment to the professionals.

That's all, bro.

Do you have a source for you last statement?

Eye Start AF
Eye Start AF isn't anything new to previous Minolta SLR owners but Sony are obviously keen to continue its use. On the A100 Eye Start AF does exactly what it says, when the sensor detects the proximity of your eye to the eyepiece it begins to auto focus and remains in 'continuous' auto focus until the shutter release is half-pressed or you put the camera down. In reality this means that the camera is likely to have an approximate focus on the subject before shutter release.

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

Unfortunately, the model that my last employer had would never stop continuously focusing even if the shutter button was pressed down. It would act like it had locked focus, and then if you moved the camera too much it would "refocus." Maybe it was just a bad copy, or old. Either way, it sucked.

In my opinion, it was just another gimmick that apparently crossed over from the Minolta era (which went over wonderfully as you can tell), which has no other use than to help lazy photogs who can't muster the strength to press the shutter button to AF. But it's w/e to me. I never had to touch that camera again, lol.

It wasn't a bad copy. You just didn't know how to use it.The "Eye-Start" will focus to where your focus point is, without the need of pressing and holding the shutter button halfway. Don't post anything if you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[bentcountershaft]

If you think Sony's way of doing LV is the same way as Canon and Nikon do theirs, you don't know what you are talking about. Sony is doing a double sensor approach for the LV. It is better and faster.

I wasn't talking about Sony specifically, just the use of live view in general on any make.

You said Sony, didn't you? Don't bring that LV issue in here because Sony LV doesn't have any kind of issue.

I've already addressed this in my response to kassad. I'm not doing it again just because you can't read.

 

[EchoingWhisper]

Post the link on here

Do I have to do that for you? Im not a babysitter.lol. You know there is Google search, Yahoo, etc., right? Nyehehehe!!!

So you are EchoingWhisper now? You wish Nyehehehehe!!!

You couldn't see it via a link. Even if I gave you a link, you'll have to click through it.

 

[o hey tyler]

What did I say that made you think that I am a troll? You are just saying that because you can't accept the truth that Canon cameras IQ is really inferior to the camera that you Canon trolls are bashing. Sorry bro, that's life

NEX 3 vs 7D – Who will win ? | Resensor - Alex Sierra's Lens and Camera Review

You're trashing a camera brand. That makes you a troll.

Hmmm. Let's see....
Belial (you): "It's not the number of lenses it's the fact that Sony has many missing areas. Also their lenses are ridiculously priced an there's just no good models".
"Yet most other sites disagree. Let's face it. Slt is a crap tech that'll never go anywhere"

Tyler: "Of course you're not dumb as a box of rocks. If you were, you'd own an A77"

Derrel: "I think I'm going to have some vinyl bumper stickers made up, "Sony A77 versus A Real Camera", and sell them for $6 a pop!"

If you think I'm a troll, okay whatever. . But there are more bigger trolls in here, and you're one of them lol

List of posts in which Argue has trolled.

 

[belial]

In a troll for bringing up that Sony has a poor lens selection? They have less than half of the lenses canon and Nikon have.

 

[gsgary]

Nex7 still looks **** at iso3200 after 18 pages

 

[rexbobcat]

What did I say that made you think that I am a troll? You are just saying that because you can't accept the truth that Canon cameras IQ is really inferior to the camera that you Canon trolls are bashing. Sorry bro, that's life

NEX 3 vs 7D – Who will win ? | Resensor - Alex Sierra's Lens and Camera Review

You're trashing a camera brand. That makes you a troll.

Hmmm. Let's see....
Belial (you): "It's not the number of lenses it's the fact that Sony has many missing areas. Also their lenses are ridiculously priced an there's just no good models".
"Yet most other sites disagree. Let's face it. Slt is a crap tech that'll never go anywhere"

Tyler: "Of course you're not dumb as a box of rocks. If you were, you'd own an A77"

Derrel: "I think I'm going to have some vinyl bumper stickers made up, "Sony A77 versus A Real Camera", and sell them for $6 a pop!"

If you think I'm a troll, okay whatever. . But there are more bigger trolls in here, and you're one of them lol

There is a difference between being facetious and truly trying to instigate a hostile response.

You know those comments aren't true, as do I, so they weren't trolling. They were using an english convention called sarcasm.

You, however, purposefully try and get people angry.

I do have a question for you, though.

Does it really and truly matter what kind of camera someone has? I mean, the "Afghan Girl" portrait was shot with a Nikon FM2 camera, which is obviously less advanced than the SLT A77. So I don't really understand why it's so important to you to have the biggest technological d*** on the forum....

 

[rexbobcat]

Do you have a source for you last statement?

Eye Start AF
Eye Start AF isn't anything new to previous Minolta SLR owners but Sony are obviously keen to continue its use. On the A100 Eye Start AF does exactly what it says, when the sensor detects the proximity of your eye to the eyepiece it begins to auto focus and remains in 'continuous' auto focus until the shutter release is half-pressed or you put the camera down. In reality this means that the camera is likely to have an approximate focus on the subject before shutter release.

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

Unfortunately, the model that my last employer had would never stop continuously focusing even if the shutter button was pressed down. It would act like it had locked focus, and then if you moved the camera too much it would "refocus." Maybe it was just a bad copy, or old. Either way, it sucked.

In my opinion, it was just another gimmick that apparently crossed over from the Minolta era (which went over wonderfully as you can tell), which has no other use than to help lazy photogs who can't muster the strength to press the shutter button to AF. But it's w/e to me. I never had to touch that camera again, lol.

It wasn't a bad copy. You just didn't know how to use it.The "Eye-Start" will focus to where your focus point is, without the need of pressing and holding the shutter button halfway. Don't post anything if you don't know what you are talking about.

It says "until the shutter button is pressed halfway down." I did that and the technology still didn't work. What's the point of having continuous focus all the time? Seems kind of stupid to me.

It did focus to my focus point, but it never stopped focusing....that's my point. Is my English not fluent enough?

 

[kassad]

Nex7 still looks **** at iso3200 after 18 pages

What does that have to do with this thread. Oh wait never mind.

 

[gsgary]

Nex7 still looks **** at iso3200 after 18 pages

What does that have to do with this thread. Oh wait never mind.

Well if you go to the first post it is a noisy iso 3200 shot

 

[cosmonaut]

I don't really understand what the big issue is? This is a Sony forum. If you don't like Sony please stay out. You really have little business here anyway.