irreversible1993
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2011
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
So for awhile now, I've been debating on whether I should buy the Nikkor 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 DX lens, or the Tokina 11-16 mm f/2.8 lens, and I decided that I'd want the zoom feature of the nikkor more than that of the Tokina.
BUT: I've heard Tokina is really high quality.
----------------
So, quality is now the deciding factor: How good is the quality of the Nikon 10-24? Is it completely crisp? do the edges blur out? And if so, is it noticeable? How well do the colors come out? Are they generally nice, bright and distinct colors? Or not? How does its quality compare to that of other lenses, and specifically the Tokina, if you know about it?
Oh and minor last thought: Being at 3.5 (or 4.5) aperture for the Nikkor, how fast can the shutter speed be at ISO 100-200 in a: bright day, in a well-lit room, in a somewhat-lit room, at midday, at evening light. Just very generalized ones, I just want an idea to think of how I'm missing out with the higher f-stop
Thanks so much!
BUT: I've heard Tokina is really high quality.
----------------
So, quality is now the deciding factor: How good is the quality of the Nikon 10-24? Is it completely crisp? do the edges blur out? And if so, is it noticeable? How well do the colors come out? Are they generally nice, bright and distinct colors? Or not? How does its quality compare to that of other lenses, and specifically the Tokina, if you know about it?
Oh and minor last thought: Being at 3.5 (or 4.5) aperture for the Nikkor, how fast can the shutter speed be at ISO 100-200 in a: bright day, in a well-lit room, in a somewhat-lit room, at midday, at evening light. Just very generalized ones, I just want an idea to think of how I'm missing out with the higher f-stop
Thanks so much!