timethief
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
- Messages
- 909
- Reaction score
- 19
- Website
- www.x5.net
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Here is the link to the news at nikonrumors ....in case you guys don't know already.
With the 500$ price reduction the D700 is looking to be the better option for me at the moment than the D800.
I want to go full frame and the D700 will do everything I want.
The D700 will probably be testing my limits rather me testing its limits. And the extra 500$ can go into the next lens i suppose.
....unless there is a D700s in the pipeline. T.Hogan seems to think there is gap that needs to be filled
With the 500$ price reduction the D700 is looking to be the better option for me at the moment than the D800.
I want to go full frame and the D700 will do everything I want.
The D700 will probably be testing my limits rather me testing its limits. And the extra 500$ can go into the next lens i suppose.
....unless there is a D700s in the pipeline. T.Hogan seems to think there is gap that needs to be filled
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]...The interesting thing is that there are two missing cameras from Nikon's DSLR lineup: a high end DX model, and an entry level FX model. The D7000 doesn't satisfy the high-end DX side primarily because of its buffer. That, coupled with the new "top" for DX being 24mp (Sony A77, NEX-7), means Nikon doesn't have a true competitor at the top of the DX line at the moment. I can't see Nikon foregoing that, so it's easily imaginable that the D300s replacement is a 24mp DX D400. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]On the other hand, there's that strong demand for a D700s. Curiously, Nikon announced that they'll continue to build the existing D700, but they didn't change pricing at all. That seems like a "patch," not a solution. Either the D700 needs to come down to a price one full step below the D800, it needs to get the D3s sensor, or both. [/FONT]
Last edited: